Okay, here's a question that I have been pondering for quite some time, and can't seem to find the answer. Or, perhaps I read it and just forgot...
Let's say that I have calculated a putt for Distance/Uphill-Downhill/Break/Wind, and I come up with a total of 39 feet (Tourney, but that really shouldn't matter for the purpose of this illustration/question.) By MY calculations (again, not relevant), I should be able to hit it:
100% at 30 Foot Scale; or,
75% at 40 Foot Scale; or,
50% at 60 Foot Scale; or,
30% at 100 Foot Scale; or,
20% at 150 Foot Scale; or,
10% at 300 Foot Scale...
...and still get a total of 39 feet of travel.
Q. Will I get a greater variation on my line, right or left, if I miss the "DING" at higher scale (e.g. 10% at 300 Foot Scale)?
I'm thinking that at a higher scale, each pixel right or left of the ding would produce a greater angle away from your intended line.
Thanks,
Bunny