Forums

Re: Equalization for ball representation

• RWathen 30 Posts

  Mon, Jun 9 2014 10:22 AM

   I would like to suggest that if WGT, representing and selling balls for Nike, Callaway, etc, 

  make the purchase of a ball more real. Since they claim to have the closest to real life virtual game.....? Then why not increase the durability of a ball that costs $6.50 a sleeve? Jeeze WGT! Don't you think that each pak of balls should have a longer durability, along with the high price, distance, spin, meter? I know alot of players would rather see an update like that, over say.... Clapping back-round sounds for a birdie?   Just a suggestion, that I would love to see come about.

• bluzgolf 1,077 Posts

  Mon, Jun 9 2014 10:29 AM

  They'd be losing money (make less), not going to happen.

• PTrenter 437 Posts

  Mon, Jun 9 2014 11:21 AM

  I wonder how long until the first 1000c/sleeve comes out.  Leaving golden flakes in its trail and ending back at the tee with full BS.  They might even sneak into the 3.0 durability but doubt it.

• bluzgolf 1,077 Posts

  Mon, Jun 9 2014 11:58 AM

  Nah, my guess would be 1.5.  ;-)

  PTrenter:

  I wonder how long until the first 1000c/sleeve comes out.  Leaving golden flakes in its trail and ending back at the tee with full BS.  They might even sneak into the 3.0 durability but doubt it.

   

• RWathen 30 Posts

  Mon, Jun 9 2014 12:01 PM

  That just made my day! Thank you! I don't remember the last time someone made me laugh this hard! I'm not kidding.... I love the Gold Flakes!  Kewel! And I realize they might think they would lose $, but I think in fact... They might make $. I have several friends that won't by the Nike Red, because of dura bility. Oh well It was worth a shot No?