There is an equal a and b argument for single play also, look at the money list and some of the averages. And if your player A can shoot 65-67 that much he sure is going to shoot 60's more often than one in a hundred, especially in multi-play. And this could go on and on.
I fully understand your thoughts, and they are no more open minded than one who you would label as simple-minded. There really is no reason for personal attacks to try and get your point across, it's not going to get me or anyone else to pay attention to you more, but then you appear to be a young man and yet may learn this one day.
Until there can be a means to equal the variables for all players, some for example, processor speed, memory, video card, time of day played, equal wind speeds and directions, single play on a computer game, which as with any sport or game is not real life, cannot be the sole determination of this community's abilities. At least with multi-play you can eventually get in a glitch free game on occasion. Like comparing your ball abilities if you played in the new Yankee stadium with the best equipment to playing in a parking lot behind Wal-Marts with a rag wrapped around your hand and a lopsided ball.
Using all stats, including multi and single play tournaments, is the only means to equate players. And even this would be lacking.
My only goal is to shoot a 26 someday, I'll be looking to see when you do it in multi-play.
I'm done with this thread now, if you wish to carry this discussion on use my wall.