Forums

Help › Forums
Forums » Product Discussions » Equipment & Avatars » CG16s' vrs RTX 2.0s' is difference worth the cost

Re: CG16s' vrs RTX 2.0s' is difference worth the cost

rated by 0 users
Fri, Jun 17 2016 9:08 AM (5 replies)
  • Wheels65
    Wheels65
    744 Posts
    Thu, Jun 16 2016 3:28 PM

    Is there really much difference between the CG16 Cleveland Wedges and the RTX 2.0's. 

    Yes I can see the .5 (point 5) improvement in forgiveness and the same meter "slow down" but neither of these = amped-up precision.
    For those who have them (please refrain from answering if you don't), are they worth the extra credits?

  • newcastleb
    newcastleb
    1,813 Posts
    Fri, Jun 17 2016 1:39 AM

    I was stuck in the same quandary a while back, when a CC member advised me to get them, saying they might save a stroke or 2 a week.  I had cred's aplenty to invested, and am glad I did.

    Like any need club take a bit of getting used to (esp. the bs which I find easier to control with the RTX's) but once dialed in I do feel my results are slightly improved.

    Worth the credits?? - Only you can decide, but they are an improvement over the CG's IMO

    Thomas

  • YankeeJim
    YankeeJim
    25,827 Posts
    Fri, Jun 17 2016 4:52 AM

    Wheels65:
    Is there really much difference between the CG16 Cleveland Wedges and the RTX 2.0's.

    Performance-wise, I didn't see a difference. The only reason I even switched to them after a free rental period was because the meter speed matches the Vapors. Everything else about them is the same and I use all 5 shots with them.

  • Wheels65
    Wheels65
    744 Posts
    Fri, Jun 17 2016 7:44 AM

    Thanks for the replys. I'll probably jump on the after the next "free rental" weekend.

  • mkg335
    mkg335
    5,491 Posts
    Fri, Jun 17 2016 8:38 AM

    I agree with Thomas and Jim.  I switched in order to match meter speed with my irons.  Performance is probably slightly better just because it's a bit easier to hit where I want on the meter with the 588's.

  • skccvb
    skccvb
    799 Posts
    Fri, Jun 17 2016 9:08 AM

    mkg335:

    I agree with Thomas and Jim.  I switched in order to match meter speed with my irons.  Performance is probably slightly better just because it's a bit easier to hit where I want on the meter with the 588's.

    Yes, slightly better- but def. easier to hit exactly what you want.

     

RSS

Getting Started

Help

Active Threads