Forums

Re: RE-scoring average

• DodgyPutter 4,690 Posts

  Mon, Apr 5 2021 8:22 AM

  alosso:

  On a second view, next to the 29, there is a 58 counting as much, but these are three below 60 among 20+ above...

  There are as many scores in the 70's as there are in the 50's, I'd bet a sleeve on the average of the shown scores (about 200 of them? Dating back to October) being above 62 :-)  He must be saturated.

• alosso 21,069 Posts

  Mon, Apr 5 2021 10:56 AM

  DodgyPutter:

  There are as many scores in the 70's as there are in the 50's,

  Actually, more...

  Of 177 scores visible in the history, 14 are below 60 (*), 27 are exactly 60, 107 are 61-69 and 29 are 70+.

  (*) 3x 56, 10*58, 1x59.

  DodgyPutter:

  I'd bet a sleeve on the average of the shown scores (about 200 of them? Dating back to October) being above 62 :-)

  I don't bet against you ;)

  You're correct: 64.67

  DodgyPutter:

  He must be saturated.

  Bold but more probable than not.

• DodgyPutter 4,690 Posts

  Mon, Apr 5 2021 1:51 PM

  alosso:

  You're correct: 64.67

  DodgyPutter:

  He must be saturated.

  Bold but more probable than not.

  Lol alosso I think generally we agree, and I'm happy to say emphatically he is saturated.

  If he wasn't his average must have been a good bit under 59 before the last 177 rounds.  Apart from that needing a major loss of form I don't think he'd be on here talking about how it isn't going down.

   

• alosso 21,069 Posts

  Mon, Apr 5 2021 9:08 PM

  stevie1026:

  Thank you to all of you for your responses....I should have stated that I am indeed saturated,(for the second time), being a probably not even "average" player, my -7 and -8`s (for 9)  don't come often which is why I was curious. Thank you....stevie

  Thanks for the clarification which proves DP's position. I had an idea because you focused on those two scores (three in fact) as if the others were meaningless (which they are, saturated). OTOH, I didn't want to close the case on my assumptions.

  Also, I'm on your page due to my own below average game. I'm stuck at 65 as a Legend, and my game has deterioated so much that I don't break Par often. It's certainly a lack of practice, it may be a necessity to step up the tools, but I'm not motivated to change any of that.

  Have fun!

• DodgyPutter 4,690 Posts

  Tue, Apr 6 2021 3:01 AM

  stevie1026:

  Thank you to all of you for your responses....I should have stated that I am indeed saturated,(for the second time), being a probably not even "average" player, my -7 and -8`s (for 9)  don't come often which is why I was curious.  Thank you....stevie

  Sorry I missed this slotting in, another guess would be you're still moderated :-)

  Remember it's scores you need to look at not - par, a -5 on a par 34  is a 29 the same as a -7 on a par 36.

  You just need to drop these 180 strokes and everything from a 59 down will chip away at it, gl and have fun :-)