WGTNico: While there hasn't been a lot of discussion about the changes, most of it has been positive. You can find the discussion in the main Discord in the #esports channel. Also, yes that pro player Discord does exist and only has players that have participated in live events in the past, and even then there was little discussion about these changes outside of them liking the changes.
Maybe it wasn't clear what I meant, although it's difficult to see why I'd worry about lack of discussion after the changes were made-if I wanted to then I'd discuss them. I didn't mean reaction, I meant discussion of what the changes there were going to be.
There was none of that in the main Discord or your own forum, I strongly suspect there was in your "elite" group. You say they like the changes; of course they'll like having to play less of the unlimited, the top 50-top 10 round... maybe a couple will miss out on making top 10 a few times but over the season it won't matter, and the clock is still absent most of the time and long when it is there.
More to the point I reckon, and I freely admit this is all supposition, is that you (wgt but probably mainly you) went in with the attitude that you really were going to make this more open, talked to the elite players and came up with the changes there are. Two definitive things you said (that the elite like the changes and that the changes make it much more open) don't really sit well together to me. That is why I think the reason they "like" them is that there may have been real changes, 45sec clock every round etc etc, and it's better (for some of them) than that.
WGTNico: We fully knew that this new format would end up with less ball hits and that's completely okay because we wanted each Live Series event and the season as a whole to overall be more competitive.
I severely doubt you need worry about that. I'd reckon typically the number of people that play the unlimited decreases massively as time goes on. By the final week folk will have looked at a scoreboard seen they needed to score 49 to qualify for the top 10 and stopped playing it. By shortening it by a week (or whatever) and making it the top 50 there will be more still active in the final stages. Only those you discussed the changes with, and a few others of similar quality of play, will play less.
As I've probably written too much and made a sidestep likely, one question and one request.
Did you discuss this with the "elite discord group" before publishing the new rules?
It would be nice if you said at the start if the second place gets HoF if a previous winner finishes top.