Forums

Help › Forums

ridiculous cutoff levels

rated by 0 users
Fri, May 18 2012 7:28 AM (58 replies)
  • BubbaCrusher007
    1,567 Posts
    Fri, May 11 2012 8:01 PM

    All I can say is: If the scores cause this much controversy, it must be a F'n good game eh?

  • barbarella24
    513 Posts
    Fri, May 11 2012 8:11 PM

    MBaggese:

    barbarella24:

    most of the scores can be understood if you change the word 'player' with 'gamer'

    What an azzwipe

    Why? Do you not realise that this is a computer game? Is your life only lived on the computer so you've forgotten what 'real life' is? Instead of an insult why don't you explain your sentiments?

  • Aahna
    1,102 Posts
    Fri, May 11 2012 9:25 PM

    rlbruce:

    Soulcatcher and others with realistic averages, I'm not talking about you.  Of course we all have good rounds occasionally.

    I'm talking about those people with AVERAGES of 60 and below.  That is what I believe is not possible without some type of assistance with your play.

    As this post originally started, with all the variables in the game and your hand to eye coordination playing a factor it is, in my humble opinion, impossible for anyone to AVERAGE this low.

    ok so u r saying that we cheat, F9, can't argue with a Level 79 TOUR PRO (Cheater), who does not have any Balls to be even a master or a Tour Master that too after joining the game back in 2009, who is scared of big tees and is happy with his BABY TEES, who is soo F****D bout he can't shoot low and always thinks if i can't play this game then there is no Freaking way anyone else can, who says that i asked evidence that good players play that good and no one stepped up, LoL who r u to ask fr evidence?? u r no one to say anything about anyone, still if u want to see how good players play their game see bolloxinbruges game in youtube and see how he plays and how to putt or even hit a shot and stop whining around and still if u r not satisfied, please mind ur own business and quit talking trash.

    sigh

  • piztaker
    5,743 Posts
    Fri, May 11 2012 9:43 PM

    rlbruce:

     Because of all the variables involved, there is no way players can shoot those low scores without some type of assistance.

     

    I can understand how someone with your scrambling stats might think that.

  • jvr86
    799 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 6:12 AM

    How can a play a qualifier if I can't trust my clubs? If a dinged  shot get deviated more than a missed shot? The deviation on the US Open is kind of ridiculous.

    I understand the you can't make the same shot 2 times, but a 10 yard difference for a similar dinged shot, with same wind, distance and elevation... is just worst that the precision of WGT starter clubs.

    Probably I'm gonna need to restart over and over again waiting for the round blessed with the good deviation :).

  • BeachedMulligan
    1,238 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 6:34 AM

    piztaker:

    rlbruce:

     Because of all the variables involved, there is no way players can shoot those low scores without some type of assistance.

     

    I can understand how someone with your scrambling stats might think that.

    To Qualify you only need to shoot one good 18. What does stats have to do with that? Get off your high horse Pizzy. The "assistance" the players have is only thousands of rounds of practice, and a good break or two in a round of 18.

     

  • MBaggese
    15,367 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 7:21 AM

    barbarella24:

    MBaggese:

    barbarella24:

    most of the scores can be understood if you change the word 'player' with 'gamer'

    What an azzwipe

     

    Why? Do you not realise that this is a computer game? Is your life only lived on the computer so you've forgotten what 'real life' is? Instead of an insult why don't you explain your sentiments?

    Sorry pal, I was in a poor mood.

    My apologies.

  • piztaker
    5,743 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 7:51 AM

    BeachedMulligan:

    piztaker:

    rlbruce:

     Because of all the variables involved, there is no way players can shoot those low scores without some type of assistance.

     

    I can understand how someone with your scrambling stats might think that.

    To Qualify you only need to shoot one good 18. What does stats have to do with that? Get off your high horse Pizzy. The "assistance" the players have is only thousands of rounds of practice, and a good break or two in a round of 18.

     

    BeachedMulligan:

     

    piztaker:

    rlbruce:

     Because of all the variables involved, there is no way players can shoot those low scores without some type of assistance.

     

    I can understand how someone with your scrambling stats might think that.

    To Qualify you only need to shoot one good 18. What does stats have to do with that? Get off your high horse Pizzy. The "assistance" the players have is only thousands of rounds of practice, and a good break or two in a round of 18.

     

     

    You missed my point entirely, but I'm not surprised.

     

  • SgtDoodles
    3,112 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 11:21 AM

    piztaker:

    BeachedMulligan:

    piztaker:

    rlbruce:

     Because of all the variables involved, there is no way players can shoot those low scores without some type of assistance.

    I can understand how someone with your scrambling stats might think that.

    To Qualify you only need to shoot one good 18. What does stats have to do with that? Get off your high horse Pizzy. The "assistance" the players have is only thousands of rounds of practice, and a good break or two in a round of 18.

    You missed my point entirely, but I'm not surprised.

    No, YOU are the one who missed the point entirely. You do not need to be good at scrambling to shoot a 53. You need 100% GIR for a start, which means you don't have to scramble at all. You can have 0% scrambling stats, but if you make 100% GIR or have a putting average on or close to 1.-- you will still shoot low.

    Btw, could you stop with the damn one-liners. It gets very annoying.

    Anyway, he didn't miss the point since you weren't making a point, just trying to make another smart ass comment. That being said, I guess you were making a point - the point being that you always make these dumb one liner comments.

  • chris2345
    528 Posts
    Sat, May 12 2012 6:05 PM

    Bruce, my average is in the 61's, am i a cheater? If U say yes thx for the ego boost.

RSS