I think Alosso is right. On the face of it it doesn't make much sense, and it would be much better to have a percentage success from the different ranges. I think what WGT are giving is the number of putts you have holed from that range compared to the total number of putts altogether, instead of the total number of putts taken from that range.
One Putt %
|
48.14%
|
Two Putt % |
48.66% |
Three Putts or More % |
3.20% |
% Putts Made from 0 - 5 Feet |
45.10% |
% Putts Made from 5 - 10 Feet |
13.19% |
% Putts Made from 10 -25 Feet |
6.45% |
% Putts Made from 25 - 50 Feet |
0.57% |
% Putts Made from 50+ Feet |
0.04% |
can only make sense if you add in:
% Putts Missed from 0-5 Feet 3% % Putts Missed from 5-10 Feet 8% % Putts Missed from 10-25 Feet 18% % Putts Missed from 25-50 Feet 4.65% % Putts Missed from 50+ Feet 1%
Grand total 100%. But unless WGT supply the Missed stats as well, they are of little value.