DynamiteTommy:raise my scoring average so people would not be afraid to play me
I take it all back. Your posts are great...
As I recall, you are one of many that were afraid. please refrain from life.
sure would be nice if people like jimbob and paultron would stop trolling. and many of you are like them on here. It's not classy 1 bit, nor entertaining.
DynamiteTommy:afraid. please refrain from life
I am bad please have your candy back
http://www.wgt.com/forums/t/189314.aspx?PageIndex=20
feel free to eat glass, mate. preferably a lot. cheers
DynamiteTommy:feel free to eat glass, mate. preferably a lot. cheers
You can be so very cruel in between your superhuman demolishing:)
You can be so very cruel in between your superhuman demolishing:) Never realised you and trolls such as Fecks were so very close. Touching...when is the big day?
DynamiteTommy: sure would be nice if people like jimbob and paultron would stop trolling. and many of you are like them on here. It's not classy 1 bit, nor entertaining.
How ironic. The guy claiming the K15's to be a superior set to the G20's is accusing others of trolling. Thanks DT, that one just made my day LoL.
courteneyfish: Pretty good apart from the bunker play I'd say. ;-)
Pretty good apart from the bunker play I'd say. ;-)
Thanks and I hope you weren't just being kind. ;) I had a feeling my sandsaves weren't in the top numbers but without really looking at a lot of other players, I had no idea. I'll get some practice rounds in on the Par 3 course and miss the greens for some practice.
YankeeJim: Stats are tough when you have a lot of ranked rounds and never fooled around protecting them, like not posting rounds or whatever. The early days where you didn't have a clue are in there. It's even worse if you've been here since before the G10s were the top club and Max was somebody's dog's name. I think you have good stats, CD, because I know you also play a lot of UL and you just know that skews them. Current score history is a better look at player's ability, IMO. You can determine a lot by just looking at what types of rounds get posted, what kind of match play record they have and whether or not that sub 60 average is a protected one or legit.
Stats are tough when you have a lot of ranked rounds and never fooled around protecting them, like not posting rounds or whatever. The early days where you didn't have a clue are in there. It's even worse if you've been here since before the G10s were the top club and Max was somebody's dog's name. I think you have good stats, CD, because I know you also play a lot of UL and you just know that skews them.
Current score history is a better look at player's ability, IMO. You can determine a lot by just looking at what types of rounds get posted, what kind of match play record they have and whether or not that sub 60 average is a protected one or legit.
Thanks for some feedback Jim. I had thought that our stats include from day one and as you said, I never thought about anything like that then. I just played to play because it was interesting and different than anything I had seen before. I hadn't even thought about the UL rounds but I usually play them to get high GIR at all costs so I don't think it changes the stats all that much re: getting up and down or sandsaves. Funny thing is I suppose it's hardest to better the scrambling and sandsaves stats when we get better and better the more we play. If I never land in a bunker again, my sandsaves will remain as they are anyway. ;)
DynamiteTommy: wish my stats were proper, but they are masked due to having to raise my scoring average so people would not be afraid to play me
wish my stats were proper, but they are masked due to having to raise my scoring average so people would not be afraid to play me
Ah an admitted SANDBAGGER folks, whatta ya know.