zagraniczniak: Are you Tour Legends all using the fanciest equipment and the most expensive balls? Do you ding most all of your shots (that you plan to ding)?
Ding at this stage is something most can do fairly well, or close anyway. When the ding is missed, it either is severly punished or not at all or somewhere in between.
Puting the ball in the right spot is also fairly obvious, when the game cooperates, that's great, but it does not always and one must be able to deal with it. There are times, that if there is a spot to be avoided, it cannot be avoided and sure as shite, the ball will find it's way there anyway.
Balls: I warned WGT about this a while ago, different balls have different everything and they change day to day. If WGT wanted their best ball to sell, it should perform the best, day in and day out. Coming up the advice was play 1 ball and stick to it. Good advice again for lower levels, but this advice needs to be placed in the bin as well later on.
The balls performance seem to be on a cycle or something IMHO and you need to be ready to switch it out when the ball starts behaving in an irratic manner.
I'm up to 5 balls now that I'm ready to play, they are fully mapped, charted and ready to come off the bench once 2 or so nines of significant deviation from norm is encountered. I'm ready to go with Cally 33, 34, max, Nike 81 and 61.There are spin off balls once all these are mapped, ie. the nike 71 plays similar to 81 etc. And in some cases the performance difference is so slight it can be ignored.
At this point I'm going to discuss the Nike 90 balls, not a rant, but an observation: I have not been able to play these as of yet, every once in a while I zip over to kia 1 and test the 4 iron to see if there was an update to the ball. Also I will throw it on the tee occasionally to see if anything has changed. I suppose it can't change now, to late for that.I burned about 6 of them mapping them as well, so I have given them a good go.
IMHO 1 pixel of spin and 1 pixel of power has a far to great and dramatic result, resulting in some cases of 11 or more yards is to much IMHO. These balls take to much effort and time to play. Needing the ability to set the spin to 1 pixel of accuracy is a pain in the a$$ and takes the fun away from the game and even then consistency is just not there. So "why bother" is often my conclusion. Especially at 7 bucks a pop. I agree with what someone said somewhere else, they are likely there mostly to make the other balls look like a bargain.
I would play a WGT ball, if I found a tight consistency, the key here for me, when selecting a ball for my current rotation, I look for the tightest consistency and will go with that ball. This is something WGT does not realise very well for the Nike 90 at the higher level. They would sell well and better had they a tight consistency, but to date, for me, they have not yet performed better then any other ball here on a consistency basis.
I also know some others have all but given up on them as well.