Perhaps you could then be so kind as to help clear my mind for me. You are correct, I am a bit confused - but absolutely not pretending. Can you PLEASE help me to understand the difference in those two comments? You know, the first one that said:
"Victims are of course absolved from any obligation to finish a disrupted round;"
.......and the second statement, that said:
"Everyone should be forced to finish the round (later alone) OR voluntarily take a (small) reputation hit."
___________________________________________________
I'm a bit confused as to which scenarios wgt should recognize the victims as victims, and in which they should consider them part of 'Everyone', and force them to decide between finishing or taking a reputation hit.
Any explanation you can offer would be greatly appreciated.