SplashLewis: As a Patriot fan, i find this awfully similar to deflate gate
I've a vague idea what that is.
It did make me think of the rule in athletics/sprinting where an athlete who reacts less than 0.10 sec after the gun is fired is disqualified. This is because they say it's impossible for a human brain to hear and process that quickly. There have been no court cases and few real complaints that I know of.
Is what wgt have done here so different? Do they have ding rates from other top players that show this one a long way ahead? That seems to be what they are saying, so either it's true or they're lying. Is the latter likely?
I haven't seen any figures, neither wgt or anyone that saw the round seems to want to give any. I'm not surprised by the former and maybe nobody outside wgt watched it (try try again, lol).
Yes the second trial, if as described, was a bad and unfair idea.
SplashLewis: I would guarantee that they "roll up" the data then purge anything older than x time, whether that is weeks, months or a couple of years.
"Activity" seems to go back to May 3rd, 90 days, not sure if that will be relevant or not.