Saurabh08:
Seriously? or are you just writing because you have to write something? No offense meant...
Wellll, I did feel like I needed to write
something to be honest, just like your post meant you didn't really
believe me, but that's understandable and no offense taken..
Duckster789:
It was from someone that defends a banned cheater in his CC.
I
have seen many of your posts in the past, and have been apprised of
your attitude towards anything different than what your narrow mind
deems to be correct, so I am making this post for those who might read
your post as your opinion means squat to any of us!
I can assure
you that if the banned member of our CC had been proven a cheat, I would
be the 1st to say it, ask that he be removed, and readily admit he was
on this forum if asked!
Having been in the loop throughout all
this and having seen ALL the correspondence between ALL parties
involved, and on top of all that being a bit narrow minded myself, this
is the only conclusion I can reach with some certainty ....
Said
player was banned on a assumption of guilt, OR they have some proof they
can't talk about because it would open up a whole new can of worms for
them, at this point I lean more to the 1st reason because they more or
less admitted it in one of their emails!
I think most if not all
of the veteran players here are fully aware that "hitting the ding"
isn't the only way to play this game well and isn't all that important
on 90% of the shots we take from tee to green! As I understand it seb
hasn't hit a ding in 5 yrs(joke) and mags only misses it when he wants
to...
Some "top" players do try to ding and do it at a very high %...
That
considered, who in their right mind believes a player would be banned
for hitting 79% of dinged shots, over 95%, yeah, I can see that, 79% no
way!
I remembered that as a legend I tried to ding every shot, and
after picking the brains of the better players and reading everything
they said, on a good day with a good meter(most important factor) I did
it at a pretty good rate of success, but now I am not a ding player FW
to Green, however I am a ding putter...so I did a little test to ease my
own mind!
I didn't count putts because I have no problem dinging
over 95% of them, and I could slow the meter even more with 5.0 meter
putter and a lvl 90 etc. ball like the banned player uses....
Focused
on hitting the ding only from the tee and fairway, 80%+ was easy to
do...after 27 holes it was a lot harder to stay focused and I missed
more of them but still easily better than 79% when averaged together...
Considering
that there are at least 1000 players who play this game better than I
do, and another 1000 if not more who play just as well as I do, how hard
would it be for them to ding at 79%, really!
Another thing I
noticed is that over the years I have been given 3rd 4th or 20th hand
info that someone was a cheater, didn't give it much thought but did
notice their scores which were nothing short of spectacular IMO, these
scores don't seem to be as low since the so called "sweeps" thread
LOL...which was the only purpose of the thread, to plant a bug in our
minds...
Sweeps software my @$$, if we think you cheat, we will
check you out, try to get you to admit it 1st, maybe give you a joke
trial, but if we think it, it is fact here regardless of any evidence to
prove otherwise...
This guy got to twitch a round, never
twitched, had a internet connection SO BAD the meter was jumpy, and the
game kept freezing, add to all that he had not played in 2 weeks, not
knowing the burden of proof being DING at 79% under these conditions
man...we don't care if you shoot -8 for 9 holes, ding it or goodbye...
Now
this guy dings at 40% that round, which is amazing to me as I was
thinking he would do maybe 10-20%, never the less, CASE CLOSED, goodbye!
So
now that I wasted your time if you bothered to read this far, this
whole ding % being the reason is absurd, the people at WGT are
intelligent or they wouldn't be there, so to me, this is the equivalent
of one of those stock emails, not the real reason, whether they actually
have evidence or it is the assumption of guilt, it isn't just ding %...