The first one that I saw say 150 for 18 holes so not sure if it was an early post that was changed before I got on today.
THEACEFACTOR has nailed this. The TRUGOLF version is a slighty enhanced TWO version and will never approach the quality of WGT versions. WGT seemed to lead me to believe that after the two Open courses this year they are done with the HighDef versions, when they mentioned that many other TRUGOLF versions could be made available if the community accepts it.
I would like a real comment from WGT. This is obviously all about the money, they are tapped out and this is a quick way to add 8 to 10 courses on a pay for play basis, splitting the money with TRUGOLF. I think the initial salvo of green fees is just for the shock factor and it will go down to about 25 credits for 9 and 50 for 18 soon to see if the 'green fees' pick up. I understand business and economics, that was my profession before I retired and WGT can not survive under the current revenue stream. The ads and pro shop sales won't come close and soon the juice on ready gos and mpc will go away under the new gaming restrictions that are now being enforced.
If this is an alterntive that allows them to quickly generate revenue then I have no issue with it. If this is (as I suspect) the future of course design, then goodbye HD courses.
WGT just needs to come forth and let the long term members know the score (pun intended). I have heard $250k to photo a course and about $250 to develop it to the playable state. If you do 2 of those a year, that is $1 million just in new course development, not to mention normal expenses. Come on WGT be honest with your members.