Forums

Help › Forums

Nike Balls @ $4.50/sleeve

Wed, Dec 28 2011 12:20 PM (130 replies)
  • Doublemochaman
    2,009 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 12:39 PM

    AGArgent... thanks alot Mr. Pujols, now my Mariners have to face you in divisional games this year.  I liked it when he was with St. Louis.  i grew up in St. Louis.

  • YankeeJim
    25,827 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 12:39 PM

    Doublemochaman:

    YankeeJim... just as long as the Yankees stop salivating over and coveting Felix...

    :)

    LMAO.  He's why they're laying quite low over the winter. When the dust settles we'll have him.  (evil leer)

  • Doublemochaman
    2,009 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 12:44 PM

    Tell you what... we'll give you Vargas for Montero.  We'll even throw in Figgins for free.  Hope Seattle's GM doesn't mind me trading players on his behalf.

  • Sanco
    1,345 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 12:52 PM

    gfsullivan:

    Raising prices on top ball to $4.50/sleeve only benefits the players that have tons of credits. Its too much, way too much greed. The game is still in "BETA" and you continue to rape us and tilt the favor to a small % of players. It makes NO SENSE.

    Still the best golf game but the WGT GREED machine is killing it.

    gfsullivan, I think you need to open a new thread if you still want the discussion on the ball prices to develop further, this one has now taken a completely different, and unrelated turn unfortunately.

  • Doublemochaman
    2,009 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 12:59 PM

    Sorry Sanco... if it makes you feel any better please know that I sometimes discuss golf in my favorite baseball forum.

    (And not to worry, YankeeJim will soon be changing his name to UpstateNewYorkJim)

  • Doublemochaman
    2,009 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 1:04 PM

    ... and just wait until Titleist signs on to WGT.  Anyone have a spare 6 bucks in their wallet (purse) for a sleeve of balls?

  • AGArgent
    343 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 2:36 PM

    Doublemochaman:

    AGArgent... thanks alot Mr. Pujols, now my Mariners have to face you in divisional games this year.  I liked it when he was with St. Louis.  i grew up in St. Louis.

    Interesting, mochaman, and I used to live in Seattle. Whacky. And I do fear that the word hapless is a sadly accurate a word to pin on the Mariners. For a few years to come. But you do have one of the loveliest parks in baseball.

  • JaLaBar
    1,254 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 3:02 PM

    Doublemochaman:
    JaLaBar... will you be doing a rundown of the American League, too?  Just please be kind to the hapless Mariners.

    The American League is harder.  At the top, I put Texas and Detroit.  After that?  Well, the Yanks should still have lots of offense, though Teixeira's steady decline is somewhat alarming.  But Cano and Granderson should be solid again.  I also think Rivera has at least one more season as a premiere closer, so they should be good there.  But I am not at all sold on their starting pitching, though I think overall they should be good enough to win the East.  The Red Sox and Rays will be competitive, but I have even more questions about the Sox pitching than the Yanks, and the Rays I don't think have the offensive horses to stay in it this year.  The Blue Jays are a dark horse, but I don't think they are ready yet.  The Orioles stink.  In the Central, the Royals aren't ready yet, though there is a ton of young talent there.  Chicago is in rebuild mode, the Twins have jumped the shark with their current roster, and I don't think Cleveland has the horses to compete with the top AL teams.  Out west, the Angels made a couple of big splashes that should have them nipping at Texas' heels and in prime WC position.  I question whether Weaver or CJ Wilson will perform up to last year's level.  If they do, the Angels could win the West.  Oakland seems to be eternally rebuilding, and the Mariners should be solid, but aren't ready to compete, talent-wise, with Texas and the Angels, Fielder or not.  And playing in that park in Seattle may cost Fielder 5 dingers a year.  Though, he does seem that as he ages, he's going to be more suited for the AL (read: DH).

    So, in the AL, I like Texas, Detroit, and the Yankees, with Los Angeles and either Boston or Tampa as wild cards, though I think the Angels may be the second or third best team in the AL.  The only other team I really see with an outside chance to crack the post-season is Toronto, if two of the top three East teams falter.

    There are more questions at the top of the AL than the NL.  Will the Red Sox bounce back? is #1, I think.  They have the talent to be the best team in baseball, if the pitching chips fall their way.  I think the AL East will end up #1)Yanks, #2)Sox, #3)Rays, but any order of those three wouldn't surprise me.  And while I think Texas will win the West, if the Angels took it I wouldn't be shocked.  I feel pretty comfortable about my three division winners in the NL.  In the AL?  Not so much.  However, there are 6 teams I feel have a legit shot at the 2 NL wild card spots (9 counting the division winners), and I only really see 6 possible playoff teams in the AL.

    And for the record, I grew up in the DC suburbs of Maryland an Orioles' fan, however the Angelos carcinoma caused me to switch allegiances to the Nationals.  So my rooting interest is in the Nats, who I feel have a good shot to compete for a wild card spot this season, after the Gio Gonzalez acquisition.  Should see Bryce Harper by mid-May if he doesn't flat-out make the team out of spring training.  The only reason they might hold him back until late May-early June is to delay his FA eligibility a year.

  • Doublemochaman
    2,009 Posts
    Mon, Dec 26 2011 3:15 PM

    Thank you for being kind to the hapless, helpless and hopeless Mariners.  Now, if only $4.50 a sleeve would buy a Fielder... (staying on topic, kinda)

  • pejon60
    250 Posts
    Wed, Dec 28 2011 6:04 AM

    I have tried these new Nike balls and found them to be wanting in so many ways

    Here is a copy of an email that I sent to WGT a couple of days ago..I will be very interested in their response ...but as I have have put in the P.S. I hold out no hope of a less than patronizing and condescending reply

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "[26/12/2011 11:34:44 PM] Paul E-J: Dear WGT

    You folks should be bloody ashamed of yourselves for charging 400 credits for these Nike balls

    Does Nike know what a load of crap you have created

     

    The inconsistency off the tee and with distance is a BLOODY JOKE

    I am a Legend so I think I can play 

    The Nike ball is a farce with anything other than a putter

     

    Example....a 115 yrd Cleaveland wedge goes 108 yrds from 40% rough ...22ft uphill into a 7mph wind

    What kind of crap is that???....bloody great if you are a PSYCHIC!!

     

    A drive on the 5th at Bethpage goes 279yrds on the fly with a R11 DINGED  into a cross wind 5 mph and then off the 6th tee with

    The same ball spin settings into a 10 mph headwind it goes 301 yrds on the fly

     

    I Have bought 3-4 lots of these balls so I have given them a chance

    How about my money back for 2 of the sleaves

     

    I use Nike balls in my real life practice bag and if they played as inconsistently as they do on WGT

    I would be ringing the Australian Distributer of Nike and demanding my money back!!

     

    Regards Paul E-J

    (Pejon60)

     

    P.S. Please don’t insult my intelligence with same kind of inane response that I got the last time I had a complaint"

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hold out so real expectation of an intelligent response from WGT

    I have found them to treat the players on this site as CHUMPS.....when there is an alternative they know they will lose members by the 10000's...so they are making money while they can ...

     

     

RSS