I guess, oilyrag, your statement would make a different sense if taken in the context of price for equipment, but what would your stance be if the equipment would be tied to tier only, and at the same price? I am asking for your user view here and not your view on the financial viability of WGT. :)
My point was that when we started that was just the case - tier based equipment, and we stuck to it and had fun in the process. Ah, and we didn't become legends in 2 months (even if "in pectore") back then ... what does that tell you. ;)
I respect you disagreeing with my last statement, and I would not expect a different opinion at this stage since you have not experienced (yet) the huge yardage difference when playing, and only when playing, a legend in disguise sporting the best equipment. ;))
I do not play tournament or games where money is at stake, but I still spend a lot, and I mean a lot of money here and would like to be able to either go back in tier or have a solution for this unbalanced system. That's all.