JaxxxonUK: The readygo's are geared towards the very best players, and there's nothng wrong with that. The people who put the time and effort into this game should be rewarded. But there has to be a way of making competitions where everyone can win on the day.
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
KO
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
I think you
hit the nail on the head here. Most of the maligning of elite players and low
scores you read about on this board stems from resentment over the fact that
the number of players who can realistically compete for prizes on WGT is really, really small. Let's face it. The overwhelming majority of players here
have no chance at all of competing successfully in the RGs and the prizes
available in other free tournaments are insignificant in comparison.
I'm not saying their complaints are justified.
They aren't, but it seems too bad that only a tiny percentage of players here
can have the experience of winning a meaningful prize in a tourney. After all, IRL,
even a weekend duffer gets the chance to play for prizes or a little cash in
the monthly tourney at his local pitch and putt. And, in doing so, no one would
expect him to play against Tiger Woods or Phil Mickelson. The PGA Tour is not
the only place where golfers can compete for money or other prizes.
I think the
solution lies in revamping the RG system. Rather than breaking them down by tier or instituting a handicap system,
maybe it would make more sense to base it on career earnings.. As players
earned more, they would be bumped up into higher level RGs and compete against
players who are at a similar earnings level. For example you could have "Level
F" RGs for players with less than $200 in career earnings, Level
"E" for players with $200-$500 in career earnings and so on, with the
biggest money earners competing against each other in Level "A" RGs. You
can fiddle around with the numbers but you see what I'm getting at. I don't
think this is a new idea. Others have hinted at it before.
A RG system
based on career earnings would greatly expand the group of players capable of realistically
competing for credits and result in more players participating. More
participants would mean more RGs and more cash for WGT. Other than
multi-accounters (a problem WGT could
solve if it really wanted to) it would probably reduce sandbagging as well. And
there would be a lot less complaining about the best being too good or scores
being too low. Sounds like everyone
wins.