hyena64:
I got Joy Systems Intel Pentium Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80 GHz
1.79 GHz, 1.98 GB RAM
Hyena, Thanks for that info its just what I needed. You have a dual core processor and 2Gb memory which exceeds the WGT minimum system requirement by quite a bit.
A dual core CPU running at 1.8 Ghz is much faster than a single processor Pentium 4 running at 2.0Ghz (the WGT min. req.)
How can I say that? There are benchmarking programs that run a specific set of test programs on computers and record the results. The results typically include how long it takes a computer to run a test program. The results are tabulated and assigned a score. These scores are an apples-to-apples comparison of CPUs and the higher the score the faster the computer. (Many people treat the scores as linear, a CPU with a score of 1500 is considered 3 times faster than a CPU with a score of 500.)
Using the popular Passmark benchmarking data: Hyena's CPU scores 1,026 while the WGT minimum requirement Pentium 4 @ 2.0 Ghz scores 247.
Here's some more benchmark results for comparison.
CPU Benchmarking Test Results from PassMark
PerformanceTest benchmark results
|
CPU |
CPU Mark* |
CPU Category |
Comment |
Intel Xeon
E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz |
16,609
|
hi end CPU |
The fastest Server
CPU available on 11/6/12 |
Intel Core
i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz |
12,807
|
hi end CPU |
Fastest Desktop CPU
available on 11/6/12 |
Intel Xeon
E5-2650 @ 2.00GHz |
11,635
|
hi end CPU |
The fastest 2.0Ghz
CPU |
Intel Core
i7-3517UE @ 1.70GHz |
3,817 |
hi end CPU |
Running at 1.7Ghz
doesn't mean it is slow. |
AMD Phenom II
X2 555 @ 3.2Ghz |
2,175 |
hi mid range CPU |
TWOMINUSONE'S CPU |
Intel Core i5
M 430 @ 2.27GHz |
1996 |
hi mid range CPU |
Andyson's 2yr old CPU |
Intel Pentium
Dual E2160 @ 1.80GHz |
1,026 |
low to mid range CPU |
Hyena's CPU |
Intel D925 Dual Core @ 3.00GHz |
664 |
low to mid range CPU |
Infinito3010's CPU |
Intel Pentium
4 @ 2.00GHz |
247 |
low end CPU |
WGT's minimum system
requirement |
*CPUs with a bigger CPU Mark score are considered to be faster
and better performing CPUs overall.
The rating the CPU’s are given here represents their peak performance
and not necessarily their real world performance with any specific software
application. (Kinda sorta like our
WGT Legend "averages" which represent our potential best
rounds.) |
Damn, when I bought my laptop 2 years ago it was in the top 25% and now there are desktops 6X faster!
Infinito, I need more info on your processor in order to find it on the Passmark site. Maybe you can find it?
WGTpizza:Your post is a great bit of solid proof that it
does not take much to play WGT with little or no problems. You have a 6
year old computer that doesn't even meet the minimum requirements to
play WGT (2.0mhz cpu, yours is 1.8mhz) yet you still have nominal
issues. I'm glad to see people like you stepping up to show the
community proof that WGT can be run near flawlessly on sub-optimal
machines, and without guru-level knowledge of computers.
Your enthusiasm is admirable WGTpizza, but you jumped the gun on the above since we didn't truly know Hyena's CPU specs at the time. It is wrong, as it turned out, Hyena's CPU exceeds minimum WGT requirements.
P.S. This page is so long WGT gave me 4 friggin' ads down the left side of my screen! That's absurd!