Timbo1984:The only gripe I have with the in house CC paid for tourney's is the fact you can see the leaderboard before the tournament has ended.
Which kind of hinders the potential pot, because if I see that Iconian has scored a 26 and the fee is 100cr...There is no way I'm even going to try beat that, which means thats a potential 100cr not entering the tournament.
If it's a paid for tourney I think it should be run in the same format as a RG. Only after it has closed can you be able to see the leaderboard.
+1 !
Well, except for the "only gripe" part... I have more gripes! ;-)
For example, IMO WGT's 20% rake is excessive. 0% would be great, 5% would be fine, 10% would be OK. 20% is just plain greedy. Even at 0%, WGT would make money by encouraging PLAY (thus ball and equipment sales, and overall happier players - who will then spend more time on WGT, thus buying even more balls and equipment, etc.)