Forums

Help › Forums

Re: Why Not?

Sun, May 8 2011 9:18 AM (11 replies)
  • PAGES
  • 1
  • 2
  • b0geybuster
    2,574 Posts
    Sun, May 8 2011 9:15 AM

    LOL@Lizzie

    Thank you for the chuckle :)

    Cheers,

    b0gey

  • SGTBilko
    1,686 Posts
    Sun, May 8 2011 9:18 AM

    b0geybuster:

    SGTBilko:

    Read it again and again. It says switch not take! Maybe they already have them, who the hell knows.  BOGEY!!!

    So you and I both know that this should have been looked at as future development issues and expansion, I sometimes think you should be a public relations officer for WGT. Cheers!

    You are taking switch too literal.   Maybe it should have read switch OUT, but I am telling you what I know as a confirmed fact that more pictures are needed.  

    I will give you that maybe it should have been looked at for future expansion, but then everyone would be crying even more about why the new courses are taking so long!!!

    Everyone wants there cake and eat it too.   

    cheers,

    b0gey

     

    You may be right, maybe I was taking it to literal. The intent of the post was because it does take so long for new courses that smaller ad-on's would have allowed for gap fillers between the larger updates and would have kept the play from going stale so quick. IMO

  • PAGES
  • 1
  • 2
RSS