Forums

I seriously doubt that it will matter

• barbarella24 513 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 1:08 AM

  How else would I see the proof?

   

• barbarella24 513 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 1:10 AM

  There will always be some reason why you can't show your proof. Or that you have but its been sent confidentially to someone (WGT in this case). Once WGT confirm on this thread that they have received such proof from you I will renege, until then stop the talk.

  Trying to deflect onto me 'wanting to cheat' is just pathetic.

• Ecka65 245 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:09 AM

  Hehehe..allright, I'll bite.

  So what you want me to do is search the internet - for you

  Find some cheat programes - for you

  Download them and all the risk that can entail - for you

  Work out how to use them - for you

  Then upload them - to you

  No doubt with instructions - for you

  So that YOU can finally accept the premise that cheats cheat and WGT would without doubt have its share of them.

  LOL

• barbarella24 513 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:17 AM

  Ecka65:

  Hehehe..allright, I'll bite.

  So what you want me to do is search the internet - for you

  Find some cheat programes - for you

  Download them and all the risk that can entail - for you

  Work out how to use them - for you

  Then upload them - to you

  No doubt with instructions - for you

  So that YOU can finally accept the premise that cheats cheat and WGT would without doubt have its share of them.

  LOL

  hehehe...I'll bite too

  Please re-read my posts. If you need help please ask.

  You said you are 'way ahead of me' having submitted your proof to WGT. I am happy to accept their receipt of this information.

  To continue to insinuate I am trying to cheat is oblivious to the fact that, since you have already obtained proof, you have done exactly what you are 'trying' to accuse me of.

  You have already obtained this information, downloaded and checked what was available and its workings...I wonder if you are still using it? Very suspicious!

  It works both ways

  LOL

   

   

• barbarella24 513 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:25 AM

  Ecka65:

  So that YOU can finally accept the premise that cheats cheat and WGT would without doubt have its share of them.

  You have still not understood any of my posts. Please re-read my original post where I say I don't believe you to be incorrect, showing my understanding of the phrase 'cheats, cheat'.

  You start to sound brainwashed, you have no evidence but you do not doubt.

• mnshiner 1,382 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:43 AM

  These programs do exist and this one looks pretty simple to use. The reason I think that these types of programs are useless here is because the meter seems to run at different speeds from shot to shot.

  Proof

• barbarella24 513 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 2:53 AM

  Please note, I never claimed of non-existence, but wanted proof. Instead of proof I received insinuations of attempting cheating.

• Ecka65 245 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 3:04 AM

  Barb, I can no longer make any sense of what exactly you want.  What you hope to do with me including you in on messages I had with WGT two years ago is quite beyond me.  I reported a site advertising Youtube links for a WGT cheat and WGT managed to get them all pulled down.

  Mnshiner has been kind enough to indulge you with one of the ways I suggested could be used to "cheat" the game.

  So now what do you want?

  It's ok to learn something new.  It doesn't make you "wrong".

  And BTW, chill.  I was not trying to suggest you do or would cheat.  But suggesting I was "copping out" by following rules and not going near these things....un called for.

  Cheaters cheat.  My hope is they get bored and move on.

• borntobesting 9,739 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 3:43 AM

  Ecka65:

  Mnshiner has been kind enough to indulge you with one of the ways I suggested could be used to "cheat" the game.

  So now what do you want?

  proof that they actually work like they say.

   

   

  mnshiner:

  These programs do exist and this one looks pretty simple to use. The reason I think that these types of programs are useless here is because the meter seems to run at different speeds from shot to shot.

  Proof

  guess those don't work very well. The few that have tried them and were caught were mediocre players at best. The one that forgot to hide his auto clicker icon on his tool bar then posted a screen shot of his 18th green on the ladder site shot a meager -2 70 and his playing partner with no help shot a -8 64. If those things worked like they claim his score would have much better than 70 on St. Andrews from the pro tees.

• andyson 6,415 Posts

  Wed, Feb 6 2013 5:05 AM

  borntobesting:

  guess those don't work very well. The few that have tried them and were caught were mediocre players at best. The one that forgot to hide his auto clicker icon on his tool bar then posted a screen shot of his 18th green on the ladder site shot a meager -2 70 and his playing partner with no help shot a -8 64. If those things worked like they claim his score would have much better than 70 on St. Andrews from the pro tees.

  This is so far from the facts its laughable B2B!  Misinformation at its worst.

  The person in question ( the one that posted a screen shot showing he used a cheat) shot -14 (58) on STA.  And B2B says they don't work very well?
  

  It wasn't an auto clicker but a program that can slow the meter down (among other things.)

  Scroll down to the 4th post on this WGTLS page to see the facts as reported by someone who was in the match.

  Get your "facts" straight B2B.