disgraceful decision. Sure beforehand they said all sand was going to be considered a Bunker, but if they're calling it a bunker there should be no spectators in it. if spectators are allowed in the bunkers, then next time I go and watch a golf tournament I'm gonna sit right down in a greenside bunker, it'll have a great view.
I don't know how reliable Wikipedia is but here is what they have on bunkers...
"There are three types of bunkers used in golf course architecture and all are designed to be impediments to the golfer's progress toward the green. Fairway bunkers are designed primarily to gather up wayward tee shots on par 4 and par 5 holes; they are located to the sides of the fairway or even in the middle of the fairway. Greenside bunkers are designed to collect wayward approach shots on long holes and tee shots on par 3 holes; they are located near and around the green. Waste bunkers are natural sandy areas, usually very large and often found on links courses; they are not considered hazards according to the rules of golf, and so, unlike in fairway or greenside bunkers, golfers are permitted to ground a club lightly in, or remove loose impediments from, the area around the ball."
I'm specifically talking about this part...
Waste bunkers are natural sandy areas, usually very large and often found on links courses; they are not considered hazards according to the rules of golf, and so, unlike in fairway or greenside bunkers, golfers are permitted to ground a club lightly in, or remove loose impediments from, the area around the ball.
According to what I saw on TV it looked like the description here and by Wikipedia's rules he shoudl have been allowed to ground his club but I assume it was a local rule for Whistling Sraights that didn't allow him to ground his club?
either way, that was no bunker, and if it was there shouldn't be any spectators in it