PRStevenson:
China John, you sound utterly stupid. You said in YOUR post as quoted about reading your wall. Personally I wasn't in the slightest bit interested in what you had to say but I thought what the heck, I'll have a look and it showed that you clearly have issues...and with a lot of people.
As for snide ad hominem attacks, you won't win any sympathy. If you bother to look at the posts, it's quite clear who started mudslinging. Don't even bother to bring intelligence into question, clearly you don't possess any! The idea (and it was just an idea) was a relatively simple one and just because you don't like it doesn't mean anything.
FYI - re: the proposal. I checked and the cost would not be cost prohibitive to debunk your theory. It was also a popular suggestion. I suppose the only place you have to go is to persist with your childish taunts about the 5th grade, but then that's what we expect from you. You try to sound clever but really you're nothing but hot air.
Now you're just plain lying, your second reply to my post in that you admit you read my wall and what is more the stuff you posted in the first reply could only have been gathered from my wall. So not only are you sad, but you've proven yourself to be a liar as well.
Also, all you are doing is deflecting the subject, I said you idea was stupid, and that it would not happen. It appears the WGT agreed with me as they didn't implement your 'idea'. So to deflect away from being made to look stupid you attempt to make yourself look more stupid by attacking me. That is an ad hominem attack at definition. YOUR idea was stupid that it would not be implemented and I said why, what is more Iwas backed up by WGT;s lack of action, you were proven wrong. So now you attack me.
Well feel free, my point was made long ago, i.e. your post was pointless, was never going to happen and so was stupid, I don't care what you think about me or my wall, my history or nation of residence, your opinions are like diapers, and I grew out of those long ago.