fancygirl4u:Whatever it is, it's beginning to aggrevate a lot of people.
Beginning? LMAO. There are so many ways for the game to lay the boots to you, I stopped counting, you just never know what a round is going to give or take from you. Frustrating as heck with money on the line, but it is what it is, always will be, likely always has been as well. It's meant to simulate something, not sure what though, rest assured it's happens to everyone though, to what extent? is anyones guess, hard to tell, there are players here that can recover from anything and everwhere, so looking at their profiles can be misleading.
I had a 500 credit ccc front 9 yesterday that I may as well never aimed a thing, very next time on the same course same conditions a few minutes later, I could played blindfolded as everything was dead on perfect.
The high stakes stuff is a bit of a lottery, do I like that? no, but the powers that be set this up that way for whatever reason and we are expected to accept it that way or not, our choice really.
Bottom line it's a game, and a dam good one, I have my thoughts on what would make it better, and it starts with the lottery, but never in a million years can consensus ever be obtained on that, nor is it requested.
The game has to appeal to all skills and levels of knowledge though. It has to appeal to the guy who just plays whack FCK and still expects to compete and match those skills to the guy who has every club, every wind, every lie mastered and the game must somehow attempt to level that playing field, hence we get what we get when we get it.
That is essentially how I read the specifics of the game model, whereby the better you get, the harder you work, the worse you get, at least for a while, till the programming has determined you have been beaten up enough and lays off you for a while, only to return with a vengenge later on, and the cycle continues, unless of course you just play a whack fck style then you get moments of the opposite. it's really rather interesting the more you study this game.
And some call the programmers monkeys, but monkeys they are not IMHO, you call them errors, they call them features, you say broken, they say perfect.