Here is your post:
> I saw the final round of the VIRTUAL TOUR played by FMAGNETS. He clearly used some software to get the ding (autoding they call it?) and I would like to say some bad words, not compliments.
> If you watch the whole round you see that for any shot he moves the SWING just over the ding and the meter always gets EXCELLENT ! The few times (watch the approach shot and the first putt at the 14th hole) he doesn't get the ding, it is because he doesn't put the swing exactly over the ding, but just a little bit earlier o later. Any players knows well how much is important to watch the meter running, in order to get his rhythm and stop it at the ding. If you spent the very short time available, moving the SWING just over the ding, you can't watch the meter running, so getting the ding becomes much more difficult. Not for him.... Always EXCELLENT, even when the meter jumps, even with 30mph side winds!. The definitive proof is around the minute 18:40 at the 10th hole . He had to pitch, he swinged, the bar started to run, he moved the SWING but, for some reason, he didn't succeded in putting it over the DING. He remained earlier. He realized to be not sure to move it in time at the right place, so he moved quickly far away up to the left, for aborting the shot. NOW, any players knows that you have 2 ways to avoid to shot. Just don't click and stay calm and/or move the SWING to disappear below the bar. So the meter runs for the whole bar and the club moves like for a trial, without hitting the ball. Moving the SWING away from DING is useless, unless you need to do that because the AUTODING is programmed to stop the meter where the SWING is posted over the bar!! Like it did for the whole round. So he repeated the shot, he moved the swing over the ding and he gets EXCELLENT! The only shot repeated, the only one where he didn't move the SWING over the ding. pfui
It's a fine theory, but it does not match the facts.
The following observations are Marker over ding line? / Ding? for each shot on each hole:
Hole 1: Yes/Late Yes/Late Yes/Yes
2: Yes/Yes Yes/Early
3. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
4. Yes/Yes Yes/Late Yes/Yes
5. Yes/Yes Early/Early
6. Early/Yes Yes/Yes
7. Yes/Late Early/Yes Yes/Yes
8. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
9. Yes/Yes Yes/Late Late/Late
10. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
11. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
12. Yes/Late Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
13. Yes/Early Yes/Yes
14. Yes/Early Early/Early Yes/Yes
15. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
16. Yes/Yes Yes/Yes
17. Yes/Early Yes/Yes
18. Late/Yes Early/Early
If your theory is correct, all the observations before and after each / would be the same. As you can see, they are not. This shows the claims in your thread to be untrue, defamatory towards me, and is why WGT would have pulled it as it is against their guidelines. I'd strongly suggest checking your facts next time before posting things like 'clearly used some software to get the ding' and 'So he repeated the shot, he moved the swing over the ding and he gets EXCELLENT!'.
A more intelligent train of thought would have been to consider why this statement of yours is wrong, and how it might help you become a better player: 'If you spent the very short time available, moving the SWING just over the ding, you can't watch the meter running, so getting the ding becomes much more difficult.'
I look forward to your apology, after which there will be no hard feelings :-)