Forums

NEW DESIGN

• oilyrag 875 Posts

  Sun, Dec 20 2015 5:41 AM

  the only "interesting" way for wgt to re hash courses would be to play off short tees with reduced par. .... 9 and 10 on st andrews played as par 3, the 5th played as a par 4 etc

  at least there might be a challenge to get under par .... not that i play anymore :)

• knobhead14 1 Posts

  Sun, Dec 20 2015 8:17 AM

  wgt cant even fix the freeze up problems meter probs never.mind design something else.fix all the probs everyone would be happier.its.waste .of.time.playing.anymore.stop.spending.our.money.on.balls.n.clubs.they.would.have.fix.

• lonniescott711 4,207 Posts

  Sun, Dec 20 2015 9:46 AM

  The most important part of the picture for me , is the fact that we cant get the full 18 of Pebble . Yet here WGT is now saying they will put in 3 new course additions next year .Why not fix the existing issues with the game as many as possible and add a new course as usual ? Why do we need 3 makeover courses which most dont want ? Why not create a new section of courses from lesser known courses to be added to the game .

  As others have suggested for years now sensible solutions and ideas for the game .The better business sense would be to listen to the customer . This however is not the way here at WGT .The funniest part of all though is the fact that WGT has a business association with Golf Now.com and wont use it to access more courses for additions to the game .

• mathia14 1,271 Posts

  Sun, Dec 20 2015 10:34 AM

  shovlovin:

  s

  orry bud if i ha not explained correctly a  par 72 course 18 hole course will have 3 par 3s and 3x 5 s , this a Ruling by the R A  that i wish wgt  would adhere to.

  Well, this just VIRTUAL golf & WGT calls the shots.  WGT rules the world of internet golf.  Everything else is out the window.

• alanti 10,564 Posts

  Sun, Dec 20 2015 12:04 PM

  lonniescott711:

  The most important part of the picture for me , is the fact that we cant get the full 18 of Pebble . Yet here WGT is now saying they will put in 3 new course additions next year .Why not fix the existing issues with the game as many as possible and add a new course as usual ? Why do we need 3 makeover courses which most dont want ? Why not create a new section of courses from lesser known courses to be added to the game .

  As others have suggested for years now sensible solutions and ideas for the game .The better business sense would be to listen to the customer . This however is not the way here at WGT .The funniest part of all though is the fact that WGT has a business association with Golf Now.com and wont use it to access more courses for additions to the game .

  +100 Lonnie....but you may be deemed to be negative  by some posters in this thread.

  I have always promoted this game, and still believe the potential is far from fulfilled, but a total lack of vision is obvious. 

  If it comes to a rehash, why not just randomize the order of holes for all courses? Just as pointless but might keep players who have the attention span of a goldfish happy.