SgtDoodles:
MioKontic:
BacardiAndCoke: didn't reliese sorry
No need for an apology, I was just saying I'd already asked the question.
Sarge - any comments on the finding please?
I know that is a bit of a flaw. Any suggestions on a different way? I'm not sure what I could do instead of that. I'm not a computer braniac.
Sarge
I did make a suggestion when I first posted about the problem. Here is what I said:
What should happen is that the two players from the same group should
not meet until the final in case they were the two best players. So, it
should be W1 v RU8, W2 v RU7, W3 v RU6, etc.
From there is should be easy to figure out.