Forums

Tiers and Avg Scores

• alosso 21,088 Posts

  Fri, Nov 18 2016 4:15 AM

  pdb1:

  If you must average below 60 to become a TL . Then 59.00 or 59.99 is a Tl average .

  The condition (again) highlighted by me is wrong - compare your list from page 9.

  The second part is wrong, too - there are enough other tiers in the community spotlight with lower averages - Hacks to Masters with 54.00 to 57.00 right now.

  pdb1:

  You must average below 59.00 to become a Champion . Then 58.00 or 58.99 is the first highest average a Champion can have .

  Would you decide between 58.00 and 58.99 please - not quite the same "first highest", whatever that means.

  Both the highlighted and the not highlighted statements are wrong, see magdorino, a Hack with a 54 average (from the spotlight) who is NOT a Champion.

  pdb1:

  ArnieFinlay has now defined the new system .

  ArnieFinlay has yet to publish his definition - I only see his question here.

  No hatred here, no confusion, no trouble. Troll feeding closed.

• 1,866 Posts

  Fri, Nov 18 2016 11:04 AM

  pdb1:

  alosso:

  abbielb:

  so its 58.99

  Nope - 59.00 or lower.

  59.00 itself is valid, and next lower is 58.995 which will still be displayed as 59.00.

    I think below 59.00 is correct . 59.00 is still a T L

   

  Nope, it isn't. Unless less than 200 RR were played at TL tier. but in that case, you could have a 45 avg, and still be a TL ;-)

  P.s.: When it comes to dealing with facts, alosso is always correct, mostly cause he only writes what he knows to be true and has been proven to be true ;-)

   

• 1,866 Posts

  Fri, Nov 18 2016 11:15 AM

  pdb1:

    If you must average below 60 to become a TL . Then 59.00 or 59.99 is a Tl average .

    You must average below 59.00 to become a Champion . Then 58.00 or 58.99 is the first highest average a Champion can have . Too bad your hatred clouds your math skills sir . When otherwise your math is topnotch . 

  Lmao, I'm sure you know what you meant by this, but it makes no sense to the rest.

  Fact: You become a TL, when your best 500 RR at L tier avg 60 or below. Btw, if the avg of your first 500 RR at L tier is 53, you become a TL with an avg of 53. 

  But, after you are promoted, your 1st score as a TL will become your avg. If you score a 25 (9 holes), your TL avg will be 50. But if you score a 70 (on 9 holes), you TL avg will be 140 ;-) And the avg will again change with every score.

  Same goes for champ tier, except the promotion comes with an avg of 59 or better and at least 200 RR at TL tier.

  And a champion can also have a 180 avg, if that is the 1st score he shoots at champ tier ;-) 

  So, in the context of your post, the re are NO limitation of one's avg, when one reaches a new tier. Your 1st avg is simply your 1st score. Period. ;-)

   

• alosso 21,088 Posts

  Fri, Nov 18 2016 9:39 PM

  pdb1:

  The chart [...] I did not write it .

  pdb1:

  How the hell would I know the real answer ?

  pdb1:

  I have amended the chart on page 9 .

  Oy vey ist mir!

  Any further comment would breach the guidelines I'm afraid.

• alosso 21,088 Posts

  Fri, Nov 18 2016 10:45 PM

  In between, you omitted the important third statement forming from "How the hell...":

  "pdb1: Yes I have no clue."

  pdb1:

  Why stop now ? 

  You're beyond help! (if my dictionary is right, from German: Dir ist nicht mehr zu helfen!)

• 1,866 Posts

  Sat, Nov 19 2016 7:21 AM

  pdb1:

  I have amended the chart on page 9 . It is now closer to accurate

  If you want it completely accurate, just change "below 60" to "60 or below" for TL tier. Then do the same for every tier, just change the numbers ;-)

• alosso 21,088 Posts

  Sat, Nov 19 2016 8:03 AM

  It's voluntary.

  "equal or smaller than" (or equivalent) was the text before he betterworsened it.