There is no "Quiters" problem. Quitting doesn't matter. Get over it.
If I'm in an unlimited play tourney and I bogey 1 and 2, you're damned right I'm gonna quit it. That's MY decision and I will be restarting to do better. It's not about protecting my ranking or my average, it's about wasting my bloody time with a score that I know will be utter crap. I would NEVER accept a penalty for quitting single-player games. In single play tourneys, the fact that you have forfieted your chance to finish is your penalty. And you want to add to that? Let me re-iterate:
I WILL NEVER ACCEPT A QUITTING PENALTY FOR SINGLE-PLAYER GAMES.
That's akin to forcing people to play, and that will not do under any circumstances.
Lets boil this down to it's main point.
THE ONLY REASON THE VOCAL MINORITY IS UPSET AT QUITTING IS BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS QUIT IN A MULTI-PLAYER GAME FOR ONE OF 4 REASONS:
- THEY ARE PROTECTING AN AVERAGE
- THEY ARE FRUSTRATED AT PLAYING BADLY AND DON'T WISH TO BE THERE
- SOMETHING HAPPENED (IRL) THAT MADE THEM LEAVE THE GAME
- THEIR COMPUTER CRASHED / SWING METER FAILING
- SOME PLAYERS FIND OUT THAT THEIR PLAYING PARTNERS ARE REALLY JUST TOOLS AND HAVE TO LEAVE.
#1 and #2 can be mitigated slightly by imposing a small penalty FOR MULTI-PLAYER ROUNDS ONLY. #3, #4 and #5 if offered a small penalty, will probably continue the round, but that does not solve the problem of the group falling apart.
Or better yet, and has been suggested AD-NAUSEUM on these forums, remove all Multi-player rounds from the ranking system.
Oh yea.. and play with friends. You have to expect pick-up games to fall apart. If you don't, you are delusional. Qutting happens, get over it!
**Edit... added #5 above. I would try to explain, but ....