Forums

High ding rate = cheating?

• MBaggese 15,367 Posts

  Fri, Aug 5 2016 7:51 PM

  lonniescott711:

  So from the start I looked at this all kinds of ways and commented as well . Just because I wont jump on the save Q band wagon doesnt make me an idiot but your reply shows that you are . As for you putting your hands on me in the real world you probably would . But I guarantee you wouldnt live to talk about it because I would blow your brains out . Just that simple at 55 years old I dont take well with people putting their hands on me that way and you wouldnt be the exception .

   

  See, ya showing what an idiot ya are.

   

  Did I ever say I would lay hands on you?

   

  No, I said...because of your stooooooooooopid remark about me having my face/mouth-whatever, on Q's zipper, I said..."You'd be eating out of a straw for 6 months."

   

  Pretty sure that's what I sad.

   

  Ya dumb fluck.

   

  Now, about "blowing your brains out"...

   

  Ooooooo, scary, does that mean that after you've been raised with 4 sisters, you run upto my ear....and blow?

   

  Lol.

   

  I think I have the gist of what you are saying covered...and covered quite well in fact.

   

  So let's get this straight Lonnie..shall we?

   

  You come up and insults me.

   

  I smash your face in

   

  You Blow my brains out.

   

  About have that covered do we?

   

  How about ya just go back home, let ya folks dress ya like a little girl so your sisters will play with you, and let the adults converse.

   

  Pizs ant.

   

   

   

• ThreeWheelBadAss 27 Posts

  Fri, Aug 5 2016 7:57 PM

  Not to get too involved in this, as I don't normally get involved in anything.....but isn't this a little infantile?  

• MBaggese 15,367 Posts

  Fri, Aug 5 2016 8:08 PM

  lonniescott711:

  As I remember it was Baggs who called me out  and you as well . So no dont try to justify your immature actions by blaming me . But if it makes you feel good then so be it .

   

  My goodness you are so obtuse, I chuckle.

   

  You needed to keep coming back to this thread, and tell the whole community..."let it go"...even after Dan told you basically, "just move along if you don't like he thread"..

   

  Notice Dan with a D?...want to explain you immature actions yet, by using lower case letter for his name?

   

  I asked YOU a simple question...needed no "mouth on the zipper" response, needed no "you and your friends" response, and if ya looked a tad into things, you'd actually know why, so I'll leave it it that.

  Get a grip,,,get a tight one...lol

   

   

• lonniescott711 4,207 Posts

  Fri, Aug 5 2016 8:40 PM

  MBaggese:

  lonniescott711:

  As I remember it was Baggs who called me out  and you as well . So no dont try to justify your immature actions by blaming me . But if it makes you feel good then so be it .

   

  My goodness you are so obtuse, I chuckle.

   

  You needed to keep coming back to this thread, and tell the whole community..."let it go"...even after Dan told you basically, "just move along if you don't like he thread"..

   

  Notice Dan with a D?...want to explain you immature actions yet, by using lower case letter for his name?

   

  I asked YOU a simple question...needed no "mouth on the zipper" response, needed no "you and your friends" response, and if ya looked a tad into things, you'd actually know why, so I'll leave it it that.

  Get a grip,,,get a tight one...lol

   

   

  You know what Baggs I`m going to let you  have that and all of that . Why ? Because at 55 years old Im not going to sit here and bicker and banter with you because some guy got banned from playing the game . See unlike you I refuse to be either petty or trifling .Not over a game or anything else for that matter . I came back and edited this post because I had replied to you like you were less than a person or human being . I was wrong for that . I was wrong for that as a man and I refuse to be less than a man .

   So you go ahead and post all of the snide remarks that you want too . Because as a man I know that whatever you have to say that is negative to me is just that negative . But it has no merit in my life . So you have a nice weekend Baggs I hope that you shoot some good scores and play and have fun . You and the rest of the players who want to beat this dead horse feel free to do so . It wont change a thing .  Your boy Q is still banned and the account is still closed . What you feel or have to say about me wont change a thing . I`m still playing and have fun .

   Just like your friend Willy you too have lost the battle and the war .You are free to hate on . :-) 

  Oh the remark about having 4 sisters after arguing with them as a kid I learned how to get the last word in 

• sheepsass 657 Posts

  Fri, Aug 5 2016 10:30 PM

  Nessa Clarias

  lonniescott711:

  MBaggese:

  lonniescott711:

  As I remember it was Baggs who called me out  and you as well . So no dont try to justify your immature actions by blaming me . But if it makes you feel good then so be it .

   

  My goodness you are so obtuse, I chuckle.

   

  You needed to keep coming back to this thread, and tell the whole community..."let it go"...even after Dan told you basically, "just move along if you don't like he thread"..

   

  Notice Dan with a D?...want to explain you immature actions yet, by using lower case letter for his name?

   

  I asked YOU a simple question...needed no "mouth on the zipper" response, needed no "you and your friends" response, and if ya looked a tad into things, you'd actually know why, so I'll leave it it that.

  Get a grip,,,get a tight one...lol

   

   

  You know what Baggs I`m going to let you  have that and all of that . Why ? Because at 55 years old Im not going to sit here and bicker and banter with you because some guy got banned from playing the game . See unlike you I refuse to be either petty or trifling .Not over a game or anything else for that matter . I came back and edited this post because I had replied to you like you were less than a person or human being . I was wrong for that . I was wrong for that as a man and I refuse to be less than a man .

   So you go ahead and post all of the snide remarks that you want too . Because as a man I know that whatever you have to say that is negative to me is just that negative . But it has no merit in my life . So you have a nice weekend Baggs I hope that you shoot some good scores and play and have fun . You and the rest of the players who want to beat this dead horse feel free to do so . It wont change a thing .  Your boy Q is still banned and the account is still closed . What you feel or have to say about me wont change a thing . I`m still playing and have fun .

   Just like your friend Willy you too have lost the battle and the war .You are free to hate on . :-) 

  Oh the remark about having 4 sisters after arguing with them as a kid I learned how to get the last word in 

  lonniescott711:

   

  MBaggese:

  lonniescott711:

  As I remember it was Baggs who called me out  and you as well . So no dont try to justify your immature actions by blaming me . But if it makes you feel good then so be it .

   

  My goodness you are so obtuse, I chuckle.

   

  You needed to keep coming back to this thread, and tell the whole community..."let it go"...even after Dan told you basically, "just move along if you don't like he thread"..

   

  Notice Dan with a D?...want to explain you immature actions yet, by using lower case letter for his name?

   

  I asked YOU a simple question...needed no "mouth on the zipper" response, needed no "you and your friends" response, and if ya looked a tad into things, you'd actually know why, so I'll leave it it that.

  Get a grip,,,get a tight one...lol

   

   

  You know what Baggs I`m going to let you  have that and all of that . Why ? Because at 55 years old Im not going to sit here and bicker and banter with you because some guy got banned from playing the game . See unlike you I refuse to be either petty or trifling .Not over a game or anything else for that matter . I came back and edited this post because I had replied to you like you were less than a person or human being . I was wrong for that . I was wrong for that as a man and I refuse to be less than a man .

   So you go ahead and post all of the snide remarks that you want too . Because as a man I know that whatever you have to say that is negative to me is just that negative . But it has no merit in my life . So you have a nice weekend Baggs I hope that you shoot some good scores and play and have fun . You and the rest of the players who want to beat this dead horse feel free to do so . It wont change a thing .  Your boy Q is still banned and the account is still closed . What you feel or have to say about me wont change a thing . I`m still playing and have fun .

   Just like your friend Willy you too have lost the battle and the war .You are free to hate on . :-) 

  Oh the remark about having 4 sisters after arguing with them as a kid I learned how to get the last word in 

  ffs...its a game....:)))

  https://youtu.be/UaEC-lWSlmI

   

   

   

• Jimbog1964 8,378 Posts

  Sat, Aug 6 2016 12:05 AM

  DodgyPutter:

  What I said had nothing to do with who played the round or under what conditions.  It was all about what shots wgt count to arrive at their ding percentage.  It could have been a round of mine, with a perfect meter etc, as long as wgt told me what my ding percentage was in it.

  He walked out at St As with no information from WGT as to why the book had been thrown at him other than the wall of Ts and Cs they say he had breached.  No one can tell anything specific from that.  Not news that part and long accepted.

  He then got the "judgement" (page 6).  We do not know more on this point and so thus the answer is no we do not know which shots WGT were counting as they have never said any more.  Pages on it, but for clarity that is it and hope that solves that for you.

  DodgyPutter:

  As said I give up now, I have no need to find precisely what he was accused of and nobody else seems to have any interest.  Anyway sounds like it's too late.

  As said Page 6 states exactly what he was accused of by WGT, and their reason for banning - Exactly, clearly, unambiguously and precisely states it........  

  Anything else that people come up with they are only summarising as to what else he might have possibly done.  They can surmise all day, but WGTs statement remains per page 6.

  EDIT for more clarity:

  Jimbog1964:

  Look the round was absolutely worthless for counting dings.  The meter was incredibly awful, bouncing around all over the place.

  DodgyPutter:

  What I said had nothing to do with who played the round or under what conditions.  It was all about what shots wgt count to arrive at their ding percentage.  It could have been a round of mine, with a perfect meter etc, as long as wgt told me what my ding percentage was in it.

  Away from the round and conditions issue which was brought in elsewhere for discussion:

  I repeat WGT at no point said which shots they were counting. No where in the history of communication was this mentioned.  Again page 6 is ALL we have on the iissue.

  DodgyPutter:

  As said I give up now, I have no need to find precisely what he was accused of and nobody else seems to have any interest.  

  Again Page 6 - It lists "precisely" the answer to your question.  

  Anything else WGT may or may not have thought they had or wanted to ask but never is supposition as they refuse to discuss.  It's nothing to do with nobody else being interested.

  DodgyPutter:

   Anyway sounds like it's too late.

  Sadly all fully accepted for some time.  Is what it is.

• Vaibhav5viv 886 Posts

  Sat, Aug 6 2016 5:55 PM

  Jimbog1964:

  DodgyPutter:

  What I said had nothing to do with who played the round or under what conditions.  It was all about what shots wgt count to arrive at their ding percentage.  It could have been a round of mine, with a perfect meter etc, as long as wgt told me what my ding percentage was in it.

  He walked out at St As with no information from WGT as to why the book had been thrown at him other than the wall of Ts and Cs they say he had breached.  No one can tell anything specific from that.  Not news that part and long accepted.

  He then got the "judgement" (page 6).  We do not know more on this point and so thus the answer is no we do not know which shots WGT were counting as they have never said any more.  Pages on it, but for clarity that is it and hope that solves that for you.

  DodgyPutter:

  As said I give up now, I have no need to find precisely what he was accused of and nobody else seems to have any interest.  Anyway sounds like it's too late.

  As said Page 6 states exactly what he was accused of by WGT, and their reason for banning - Exactly, clearly, unambiguously and precisely states it........  

  Anything else that people come up with they are only summarising as to what else he might have possibly done.  They can surmise all day, but WGTs statement remains per page 6.

  EDIT for more clarity:

  Jimbog1964:

  Look the round was absolutely worthless for counting dings.  The meter was incredibly awful, bouncing around all over the place.

  DodgyPutter:

  What I said had nothing to do with who played the round or under what conditions.  It was all about what shots wgt count to arrive at their ding percentage.  It could have been a round of mine, with a perfect meter etc, as long as wgt told me what my ding percentage was in it.

  Away from the round and conditions issue which was brought in elsewhere for discussion:

  I repeat WGT at no point said which shots they were counting. No where in the history of communication was this mentioned.  Again page 6 is ALL we have on the iissue.

  DodgyPutter:

  As said I give up now, I have no need to find precisely what he was accused of and nobody else seems to have any interest.  

  Again Page 6 - It lists "precisely" the answer to your question.  

  Anything else WGT may or may not have thought they had or wanted to ask but never is supposition as they refuse to discuss.  It's nothing to do with nobody else being interested.

  DodgyPutter:

   Anyway sounds like it's too late.

  Sadly all fully accepted for some time.  Is what it is.

  Guess I'll try once from Al's behalf .

  All Al was asking was :

  1) Did someone watch the 'trial' round in question at St A?

  2) If yes, can they post the number of dings categorized as drives,approaches and putts?

• mkg335 5,491 Posts

  Sat, Aug 6 2016 6:27 PM

  1) The trial round was witnessed by two mods and by the person or persons at wgt who made the final decision.

  2) No idea what was counted or not counted.

• Jimbog1964 8,378 Posts

  Sat, Aug 6 2016 11:49 PM

  Vaibhav5viv:

  All Al was asking was :

  1) Did someone watch the 'trial' round in question at St A?

  2) If yes, can they post the number of dings categorized as drives,approaches and putts?

  I did explain it was up on twitch for two weeks.........And yes WGT watched and then page 6 gives what they told him after that.  Twitch was mentioned loads in the thread...

  A few also watched the "trial" after the fact when they learned it had happened.  Again it's all in the thread.

  Remember though, as keep saying and accepted by all (well most all it seems), it is absolutely pointless counting dings that round as the meter was so bad.  

  All any one could possibly ever learn from that round is that he shot -8 through 9 with a TERRIBLE, almost unplayable, meter.  This is why (again for Al) no one is counting those dings as it is pointless as the meter was so bad.  

  Refer page 6 and read through at least first few pages.  This is not the part that is difficult I thought.

  Honestly let go of counting dings in that round.  No one, apart from WGT, cares to as the meter was so bad.  WGT did (I say again see page 6) and read first few pages at least, and that was part of our issue.  What they counted, no clue (page 6 verdict again as it does not change)

  mkg335:

  1) The trial round was witnessed by two mods and by the person or persons at wgt who made the final decision.

  2) No idea what was counted or not counted.

  1) Yes

  2) No idea what WGT counted the previous 30 days for clarity (page 6 verdict is all we have on the precise matter).  

  Also as above pointless counting any in the "trial" round anyway as meter was so bad as to render it one of zero point import....None of this discreet point is on dispute....This again was part of what makes the verdict absurd as there was NO point counting any shots in that round obviously.  Is that clear in the nicest way for the dodge.

  Back to first part: Again for  Al I guess let go of actually wanting to count dings in that round in any which way.  The fact WGT did (does not matter which way that round) is a huge part of the thread all the way through as the meter was bordeing not playable.  This is why no one else went on about it as they accepted that point v early on.

• Vaibhav5viv 886 Posts

  Sun, Aug 7 2016 12:58 AM

  Jimbog1964:

  Remember though, as keep saying and accepted by all (well most all it seems), it is absolutely pointless counting dings that round as the meter was so bad.  

  Not disputing it was a raw deal as such. If someone who watched the twitch, counted dings, it would have answered this. 

  mkg335:

  2) No idea what was counted or not counted.