The Virtual Tour is a fantastic concept. However, unlimited first rounds make it a joke. It would be far more realistic to play each monthly VT tournament over four single rounds.
WGT's need for revenue keeps the site going and allows for development of new courses.This is a fact, but I suspect WGT makes enough revenue without having to bastardise the Virtual Tour.
I suspect that WGT would not lose much revenue, if at all, if the VT were played over four single rounds because most players that enter will play four rounds knowing that ANYONE could play a poor round, or two.
Call me old fashioned, or a fan of fair play, I don't care, but the current system where ten to twenty players score a ridiculous first round leaves the second round a no contest. I refuse to waste my pills in order to score a well below average first unlimited round in order to be competitive in the second. Two, or perhaps three attempts at most. Mostly I'm happy with my first attempt because it resembles my true ability.
Some will say sour grape, but my answer to that is why waste my time and pills on a contest that is inherently unfair for anyone that isn't willing to waste time or money?
In addition, wouldn't such great scores be truly worthy of note if they were shot in a single round, such as some fine scores in ReadyGo, Bracket, and Single play weekly and monthly events?
I'd be interested to hear what other players think. And I'd also be very interested to hear what excuses WGT has for persisting with the current formula.
Mike