BeechFL:
Yes, read what I posted again, I was looking at a way to level the
playing field, not give someone a 21 shot advantage, there is a big
difference. I was just looking for ideas from other country clubs that
are different than the handicapping system that other members were
working on.
All this does is prove that I am none of the things that other's have
accuse me of being. I too was looking for a way to make games more
competitive , but I was looking for another system OTHER than
handicapping.
These are the final standings for the tournament in question.
Player |
Handicap |
Score |
Adj Score |
Total Score |
RaiderHogan |
-3 |
73 |
70 |
-2 |
Bzz59 |
2 |
69 |
71 |
-1 |
jreb100 |
-10 |
82 |
72 |
0 |
martymcfly |
4 |
68 |
72 |
0 |
fravel |
8 |
64 |
72 |
0 |
Shane028 |
-2 |
75 |
73 |
1 |
BeachFL |
8 |
66 |
74 |
2 |
Hoolahoof |
8 |
66 |
74 |
2 |
AJVit |
-2 |
77 |
75 |
3 |
Squez |
5 |
70 |
75 |
3 |
As you can see, the handicap range was wide, but the final standings were tight. It was an extremely fun tournament for everyone involved, except for one....
The fact that someone actually got this upset over such a successful and fun FREE tournament is beyond me.
This entire thread, all this typing, all the effort, all the drama...is all over one person who was a sore loser and wanted to announce it to the world.
PS....I myself put up the 250 credit prize for this tourney, the opposite mindset of the greed and bad sportsmanship displayed here.
BeechFL:
And as far as that player declining the prize, maybe a guilty
conscience? I don't know. If I had won that tournament and felt like I
deserved it, I would have accepted it.
He declined because he was using good wedges already. Are you shocked he didn't take the wedge then sell it back? Some people have honor.