chrisironsbones: If you don't like the table or what ever you only have to ignore it, and move on to another post to find your daily post writing fix..:)
Hi again, Chris, Mr. Negative here. (Nice edit-almost escaped me.) Tables like yours bother the hell out of me unless they're in some way qualified. You don't qualify yours so the weight of all of your wins must be enough to convince you you're right. I feel bad for the people that believe you because not only have you not qualified your numbers, they're just plain wrong. There, I've said it.
I'm also beginning to see the major cause of your own personal, well publicized complaints-you believe what you have. Well, do yourself a favor and hike out to the back 9 of BPB and do some serious verifying of your numbers, like I just did.
This is how you qualify results......The callaway (z) non-Legend ball (there is no standard Callaway-they're all different.) BPB back 9, holes 10, 11 and 12, low wind (in the testing this was 2-3 in every case.)
Every shot was hit up the fairway and back down the fairway until a ding was achieved in both directions.The averages of the missed hits support dinged results. This offsets the wind influence and the wind definitely makes a difference. In all, an entire Callaway (z) ball was used up to get these results. I only dealt with the back spin numbers.
120 -6
135 -4
150 -4
165 -9!!
180 -8!!
195 -8!!
210 -13 into a 3 wind, -5 with same wind (verified 4 times)
225 -4
Go see for yourself.