Yes, I know they're free to enter, but come on -- the payouts for the weekly and monthly tournaments are ridiculous. For 69th place I got 0.12 credits. I know, only 69th place, but still -- that was ahead of hundreds, maybe 1,000 or more masters What do you do with 0.12 credit? That doesn't even cover the cost of hitting a good ball one time. Anyway, top 10 is hardly better: 10, 15, 20 credits? For outplaying hundreds or thousands of other players? I don't know when the payout schedules were put into place, but they should take into the fact that there are many, many more players on WGT than there were a year or two ago. I'm not asking for the moon -- just consideration of the huge amount of competition there is... Expand it to top 100; bump anything under a credit to a full credit (FFS!) It would be good for WGT, because it would motivate people to play more (and use up their ball life) The difference between, say, 5 credits and 15 for a good score is practically nothing for WGT, but would be a pretty big deal for a lot of players.