Nice work Inf, but I would have to agree with lverti on this. Any measure should always have total holes played in the formula. I mean if you did this on the PGA tour the veteran players would always be at the top, just because they have more rounds under their belt.
Since the list is fairly short right now, I took the liberty of running some numbers and you can see how total Ham & Eggs has very little to do with "real" up and down % when you leave out total holes played. I added Lee and BB, best players on the site IMO, and also icon, one of the best up and down players we have, hope you guys don't mind me adding ya :p ;).
AvatarLee |
85.4% |
iconian |
83.6% |
BolloxinBruges |
82.9% |
ncviz |
72.0% |
marioh |
69.1% |
Infinito3010 |
68.9% |
SweetiePie |
66.3% |
lkennedy |
63.2% |
lverti |
60.5% |
Richard4168 |
59.3% |
danohi50 |
45.5% |
This is using lvterti's formula, it's basically the up and down %, when you miss the green how good are you at getting par. All the catergories used to my knowledge have been from the start of one's play, know SP was questioning that, so should be good from that standpoint.
You're asking for 6 things right now, well 10 go into this. Maybe that will be too much work I suppose maybe not. But shouldn't the goal be to accurately try to obtain a good short game tendency? Anyway, good work, love the numbers :).