linksdude:How would you guys compare the 64* Cleveland and the 64* Z-Satin? The Cleveland costs about 245 more than the Z-Satin - is it worth the extra credits?
I'd say the CG-15 64 and the Z 64 are comparable - once you get the hang of the Cleveland's behavior. The advantage of the Cleveland wedges is that from 70 - 75% up to 100% full power, the distance you get is quite linear. Hit the 80 yd CG-15 with 90% power and you'll get 72 yds; hit it 80% and you'll get 64 yds. this applies to punch shots also.
Where people get in trouble with Clevelands is applying backspin. For full and punch shots you simply don't need backspin in most situations - an exception might be in approaches to downhill slopes and/or strong tailwind. I use backspin to varying degrees to control roll-out on pitches, chips and flops.
The Sarge and I will have to agree to disagree on flop methodology ... using the 'hit the early line' method means you're not making a true flop anymore; the trajectory and overall distance are dramatically impacted. I aim left of target and try to 'ding' it - this will produce the high trajectory of a classic flop and lack of roll-out. I've never had an issue even with full backspin applied - it just stops and there is little to no 'roll-back'.
How far left do you aim? I move the aim point 3 grid squares left of desired landing spot for a 20 yd flop, 4 sq for 30 yd, and 5 sq for 40 yd. Those guidelines apply for low wind and flat landing area - you'll need to tweak it some for strong side-winds or sloped landing area.