Also agreeing over here. Myself included. If it weren't for my cc, I'd have very little interest in playing & spending money.
I realize it's probably supposed to be mysterious, but that thread about successful country clubs had me thinking. They want to hear from successful clubs about how they did it, what keeps the members there, etc - But doesn't that go hand in hand with CC features? The more tools a club has to work with, the better they can mold their club. Sounds logical.
To add to my confusion even further, there's this:
WGTdbloshoe:
As to adding new features to CC's, that list has already been discussed internally and pretty much been decided on. There has been many a discussions in the forums on how to improve so, most of the ideas people have, has already been discussed.
Wouldn't it serve both parties well if that discussion and what's been decided was shared? It might stop us from asking for the same things all the time, or help us understand why this or that won't be implemented.
As far as not making the improvements because they won't make money - honestly at this point I wouldn't even mind if they did install a Paid feature.
Wan't to make tierd tourneys? pay. Ability to delete a tourney? $$$. Change club image, make a country club wall? 1000 credits. Want forum categories? PAY UP!
Honestly, I don't know how the larger clubs do it in their forum, but with 38 people in mine, my forum gets crowded. I look forward to the successful owners committee's suggestions on that, and other things.