YankeeJim:
bettergloberoman: you need 500 rounds that are not on best of par 3 or 5, to reach saturation point.
This is just plain wrong, Alex. WGT doesn't separate ranked rounds based on where you played them. Saturation, as its being tossed around here, is the point where your average only goes down. It's based on the requisite number of rounds required in each tier.
Where's WigerToods when you need him?? LOL ;-)
Hi Jim,
before, a ranked round was a round that have an influence on your average and all your stats. Now we have two kind of ranked rounds... Those who influence your average and stats and those who don't. When you play best of par 3 and best of par 5, you number of ranked rounds in your stats increases but still they don't influence your average and your stat (except for the best round value).
What counts for saturation is the number of ranked rounds which influence your average. Indeed, in the WGT logic, one can go to a new tier only when he has a stable average. This stable average is reached after a given number of rounds depending on tier. Because best of par 3 and par 5 don't modify the average they cannot contribute to stabilise your average. So they don't count for saturation.
Another argument is the following. Imagine that best of par 3 and par 5 would count for the number of rounds needed to reach saturation (namely the minimal number of round needed to reach anew tier), then it would be quite easy to reach saturation and access a new tier.
Indeed, imagine you reach a new tier, you just need to play 1 easy round (from short tee for example when there is such a tourney), such as your average is below what is required to be promoted, and then you play only best of par 3 and best of par 5. Your average will not change and after a while, when you will have played enough of those rounds, you will get promoted. That would be very unfair compared to the normal procedure to be promoted because actually only 1 good round would be needed to be promoted.
Regards