Corwyn: Wesdogg75: Corwyn I believe with the card from last night I shot a 75
Hi Wes,
[...] Are you just submitting a score, in which case it would be the 75...
... or are you wanting your stats to be counted towards the special prize standings?
If the latter, then according to our rules, I'd need to adjust the score, taking the average of the first four holes instead of their total first time around. (Which would mean a 77 instead!)
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to assume you want the 75 score, and no stats.
Thanks, Corwyn
----------------------------------------
bhoese: jlucky and I tried it tonight. All was good (except our scores) thru 4, when James suffered the dreaded triple disco. That was a while ago, and he's been gray since. It's too late for me to restart a full round.
James was +3. His scorecard wasn't available to me after he discoed.
---------------------------------
So, in light of the above two unfortunate disconnect issues, I wanted to let everyone know that CD and I are re-examining our disconnect rule, and revisiting what to do in the above examples.
We've realized that it's unnecessarily unfair on the unlucky victim of somebody else's poor internet connection... and that, with the same player involved multiple times in the tourney, it's clear that the rule is flawed in this respect.
Even as we've been addressing the issue, I've had private PM requests asking for leniency for the affected players (coming from third-parties).
Some background: The rule was originally written with the expectation that there would likely only be a few holes left at the end to complete, not most of the round, and it assumed an unlucky circumstance that was more likely WGT's fault, than that of an individual's poor internet. Clearly we also need to protect the unfortunate playing partner if another player's connection is just not behaving as it needs to to support multiplayer games.
Furthermore, the provision in the rule that averages out a score because of the possibility of just trying to get better stats now seems incomplete: if the second time around the scores for those holes are worse... then surely the stats would be worse too, and the player doesn't get any advantage. That aspect of the rule only makes sense if the second time around scores are better for those holes, so we'll be making that more explicit.
Expect more news soon on our decisions... and please, do feel free to chime in if you have comments or suggestions for a policy that would be fair to all.
Thanks, Corwyn