Here
we go again, I will try to do just as want this time and also do my best to
avoid any irony as it only leads to confusion.
Jimbog1964:
DodgyPutter: Me too, to those with great timing and cheats with software.
Even an italics on bold, good work.
BIG ASSUMPTION!!!!!!
DodgyPutter: What assumption was there
deserving of bold, caps, italics and so many exclamation marks? That
those with great timing and cheats with software would like high accuracy and
low forgiveness? Hmmm. To clarify anyway it was an opinion, you do
the assumptions.
Now was that half a a concession..hmm
No, it was supposed to be a isn't this just obvious hmmm.
Jimbog1964: I will say that statements like that allude, at the very least when some one new reads, to if I can't do it then they must be cheating, This is not the case in any overall way minimum.
No! it is not meant this way and I don't think it reads this way either. I know and state that both groups exist. I have said elsewhere there are many better players than me, just stop it. The bold and italics were yours remember, (is that why the weird bold and italics on the and), you are incredibly manipulative of other peoples words. Your last sentence is beyond me ,ok it is not the case I agree but minimum what? Probably another accusation.
1. Also in general you were again changing what I said by putting stresses in particular
places with some, albeit fairly mystifying (or maybe not), use of caps bold and italics.
The bold, vastly over punctuated and sized BIG
ASSUMPTION!!!!!! seemed to me totally excessive and even
random.
2. Perhaps the main point is you think firstly I made a big
assumption and later (half?) a concession, presumably the latter referred to
the assumption.
All that really happened here was you said you thought clubs with
high accuracy and low forgiveness would sell and I replied "me too, to those with great timing and cheats with software".
I'm sure we agree so far, only on what was said by both of us I mean.
Yes, I did mean what I said though it was an opinion not an
assumption. I do think that a club as described would mainly attract
these two groups. I dare say there may be some without either great
timing or cheating software that think the potential reward is worth the
risk. There would also be some of the best players, that I assume
(there’s an assumption) are generally on or close to the ding, that will decide
that the risk is not worth it. I would tend to suggest (very much
opinion) the latter would be a fairly large group. The group
guaranteed to hit the ding would have no downside to this club, but apparently
we’re not to talk about that, important as this club you've invented being
great for cheats may be. What precisely am I “admitting” here, having an
opinion?
Jimbog1964:
DodgyPutter: quoting part of a sentence was
bad enough)
DodgyPutter: I would have put the whole
sentence in but I couldn't bear more muddy water, is it a fixation or a phobia
you have?
Why did you split that, what is it meant to show? I'd like to
think it was a bit of humour but I really don't know so I'll skip to your
numbered points/questions, I'll call the last paragraph (3).
Jimbog1964:
1. Skill testing equipment I personally support. I support a
new 3W with greater precision (one that does not wander as often), but with the
skill test in place.
2. Your thought's perhaps on why a game levelling easier to use
club that you would buy would be good for this game?
Or you just fancy a straight up easier club. Longer, higher
spin, lazier action yet same high loft, large large sweet spot / perceived precision
3W as what you have. No risk v reward possible downside at all to be
included, and you don't consider that bad for the game?
1. I didn't start this saying there shouldn't be such a club
though I have since pointed out who I think are the main groups that will
benefit from it.
2. You are almost funny, my post of this in it's entirety was: "I could live with the 4.5 precision. 3.5, or even 3, forgiveness would
make it must have for me. Lower standards I suppose."
So I say that this is what I would like, I say even 3
forgiveness and I admit to lower standards. What could any reasonable
person object to in this. I'm saying I'd forgo the extra .5 precision for an
extra .5 forgiveness. I do mention 1 extra forgiveness too but as I say
I'll take .5 this is largely irrelevant.
I know that moral high ground is where you naturally belong (oops)
but pretty much all the clubs/balls (including the one's you have) WGT sell are
"game levelling". We should all play with starters and pay a
monthly fee? WGT sell equipment to allow the players (all of them) to
play the game better and therefor enjoy it more I'd think that's what keeps the
majority of folk playing and spending . If they only make clubs I can't
hit with, and although I'm not near the best at this game I'm not one of the
worst either, what do you think I'd do?
So in brief if there were to be upgrades on the new 3wd and one
has 5 precision and another had 3 forgiveness I'd buy the latter. I
wouldn't say the other shouldn't exist I don't really care if 52's become 50's
or whatever. You do care deeply that my 60 becomes a 58 for some reason
though. Do remember any club I can buy you (for instance) can buy too.
(3) The answer is more a yes than a no. Yes I want a
better club but it wouldn't necessarily have all the things you listed, did you
manage a wee bit of sarcasm there?
What I always try to do when I get a new club is to get one
that's better for me than the one it's replacing, I call it an upgrade (oops).
For my 3wd I think I'd buy a new one that was 5yds longer and otherwise
the same as my current one. I would maybe eventually buy one that is 5yds
longer and has .5 less forgiveness but I am not confident enough to lose a full
point. I could even get the level 73 Callaway x2 with at 240yds has more
forgiveness and a slower meter than mine (or I could moan these level 73
players were getting a club that makes them as good as me) but I wouldn't want
to drop to 4 precision (lol). We all have what ratings we would like our
clubs to have, some more realistic than others. I don't think my wish list was
as absurd as you seem to.
Sorry I wish I was as good as you but I'm just not.
I really am finished with this now and hope to get muddy fields
out of my head one day, I will do a short post after this, it's only to show (maybe slightly exaggerate, I'll see how it goes) what if feels like to have
what I write adulterated by you. Enjoy the last word, I'm sure you
generally do.