alosso: As far as my knowledge in linguistic goes, "should" is subjunctive and as such not a fact.
linguistics; plural not singular.
"should" subjunctive used appropriately in that sentence to express my opinion.
Fact! That stretch of fairway is playable at St Andrews (the REAL one).
Context - WGT is trying to provide us with a game that is a virtual model which simulates the realism of those courses.
alosso: And "could" is as far away from facts as "should" is :)
"could" accurately expresses the hypothetical counter-argument. It's got nothing to do with the fact stated above.
The only thing you've made clear, it would seem is that a) you're confused by this thread and the language used (or pretending to be) and b) you're on a personal mission to argue about everything and anything. Not only do you attempt to confuse what's being said but you deliberately take comments out of context and spin them.
There's playing devil's advocate most of the time and then there's just being a forum troll with an axe to grind.
...and I was beginning to think you've helped give the title of this thread new meaning. Respectfully let's drop this in-fighting and allow others to pick up on the more productive comments made in this thread.
Agreeing to disagree.
Enjoy your day :)