WGTdbloshoe:
The sponsor fee is less then what the overall payout of credits are, so this is in no way a money grab. This is a way to give players or clubs a way to get their name out there. Secondly it is also giving players a chance to win more credits with more tournament options. I don't see how either of those are a bad idea. To me a money grab would be us requiring you to cover a sponsor fee and the payouts. Which again we are not doing.
Yes you can tier restrict a tournament if you want.
Looking forward to the sponsor charges clearly laid out together with the entire pay outs also clearly laid out, and separately options on how to split those pay outs.
Nothing against you here but WGTs record on quality trading lately is not much chop. ..........Up to WGT to manage that part.,
I would suggest the sooner WGT get o the above the sooner people will be able to decide if it's worth a second look or not.
EDIT: Idea make it variable for clubs to choose. 500 credit charge to type the name in and 600 credit payout. Sponsoring club chooses winner takes all, top 3 or top 10 split. Sponsoring club gets to choose tiers open to..........Make the charge variable subject to a minimum, agree payout always more, declare the WGT rake..job done?