Forums

Help › Forums

Club vs.club clash..accept or reject

Fri, Apr 8 2016 8:33 AM (4 replies)
  • twichipper
    424 Posts
    Thu, Apr 7 2016 8:29 PM

    when iy is time to play a club clash, there needs some type of parity available.when a club has a max of 250 players and a smaller  club has less than 25, is this really fair?  Only the the bigger  clubs can advance fast enough to get the upper levels for their CC.

    My suggestions are : either let there be a decline and accept button, or for WGT programming to separate the small clubs from the mid size or big clubs. At least this way, it would provide some leverage for the smaller clubs to grow in CC levels. If we had every club  of 25 members than the next twenty five and so on.(25,50,75,100 etc). if not, at least a separation of every 60 members to play another club.

    Thx..Bill

  • PaulTon
    10,731 Posts
    Fri, Apr 8 2016 2:16 AM

    They should look at passes bought per player and not passes bought per club and then give the golden shite to the very top pass buyer.

    This would mean they could dump the meaningless golf element in this complete charade and leave the rest of us to enjoy the actual game.

  • roozilla
    630 Posts
    Fri, Apr 8 2016 2:44 AM

    PaulTon:

    They should look at passes bought per player and not passes bought per club and then give the golden shite to the very top pass buyer.

    This would mean they could dump the meaningless golf element in this complete charade and leave the rest of us to enjoy the actual game.

    agree

     

  • alosso
    21,070 Posts
    Fri, Apr 8 2016 8:23 AM

    PaulTon:
    They should look at passes bought per player and not passes bought per club and then give the golden shite to the very top pass buyer.

    This would mean they could dump the meaningless golf element in this complete charade and leave the rest of us to enjoy the actual game.

    They are working hard on it - random points!

  • PaulTon
    10,731 Posts
    Fri, Apr 8 2016 8:33 AM

    alosso:

    PaulTon:
    They should look at passes bought per player and not passes bought per club and then give the golden shite to the very top pass buyer.

    This would mean they could dump the meaningless golf element in this complete charade and leave the rest of us to enjoy the actual game.

    They are working hard on it - random points!

    LMAO, you couldn't make it up! Just when we thought it couldn't get any worse!

RSS