MBaggese:
This holds for sure on Tiers below Legend, and we know that it takes effect after a certain number of rounds, but, I wonder if Legend tier just keeps rolling? Or is the numbers of rounds to complete something a 1000 or so.?'
Anyways, I really hope Legend tier just tracks ALL games...to make a good reflection on you're worth.
Thanks for your answer.
In my opinion, taking all games into account is not necessarily the best way to get an average which reflect your actual level of play. But taking only the best games is not the best way neither because at some point your average can only decrease even if you are no longer playing so well.
Actually, taking only the best games is a good way to fight against sandbagging, and I guess this is why this system was introduced (and also to make people moving up to buy new equipment :) ). Because at some point your average can only decrease and you will move up (if you play ranked stroke games :) ). So I do not see any problem with this system for any tiers except legend tier where sandbagging do not exist by definition and thus another system can be introduced.
I think a good compromise, for legend tier only, would be to take into account only the last games you played, don't know something like the last 100 or 200 games. Like this your average reflects your level of play over a restricted interval of time which will be closer to your present level of play. For example, my average is 63.56 over 273 games because, as everyone I guess, I struggled at the beginning when I moved up to legend tier. But my average using my last 100 games is 61.57, which is significantly lower and reflects better the scores I am posting now. If all games are taken into account I can estimate that it will take me, at best, another 150-200 games to drop my actual average (63.56) to a value around 61.57.
Regards