Forums

Help › Forums

How it is humanly possible? a 54???

rated by 0 users
Sat, Jun 4 2011 1:04 AM (60 replies)
  • claremoreblue
    2,322 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 8:23 PM

    Prove it.

  • andyson
    6,415 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 8:41 PM

    jakestanfill7:
      If dinged the shot should end up about 5 feet past hole.  If missed within 2 of center either side the ball will rest about 4-5 feet short and a bit to one side or the other. 

    What's the secret Jake?  When I miss the ding 2 inches either side I end up 80-100 yds short.

  • jakestanfill7
    949 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 8:44 PM

    andyson:
    What's the secret Jake?  When I miss the ding 2 inches either side I end up 80-100 yds short.

    Hehe...that's pixels not inches my friend.

  • pejon60
    250 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 8:48 PM

    What is it you want me to prove 

    That it isn't possible to consistently shoot 54's and 55's without cheating????

    I think your scoring record proves the point for me you don't have a single 54 or 55 in your scoring stats 

    So if you aren't cheating whats the problem?.......you of all people would want to see the cheats weeded out I would have thought

    But the program is in WGT's hands now and it is up to them to do the right thing by those of us who don't need to supplement a small pecker

  • andyson
    6,415 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 8:49 PM

    jakestanfill7:
    Hehe...that's pixels not inches my friend.

    You only miss by 2 pixels?  I need pixels that are 1/8" wide I guess. LOL

  • claremoreblue
    2,322 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 9:56 PM

    My problem is I'm to damn old to hang with these kids! I'm good but not a top player although I do have my days.

  • MainzMan
    9,591 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 11:01 PM

    pejon60:

    The program allows you to put in the distance, elevation, wind speed and direction. It then selects the club.... all you then do is click the mouse to start the shot

    I can manage to figure that out pretty well after my relatively small number of rounds, you don't think someone with nearly 3,000 ranked rounds can manage it with 99% accuracy?

    I believe this magic program is called a brain, seems to me there are quite a lot of jealous players here who only have one to share between them.

  • oneputtdavid
    1,337 Posts
    Wed, May 25 2011 11:55 PM

    pejon60:
    That it isn't possible to consistently shoot 54's and 55's without cheating????

    pejon...it depends on your definition of "consistently" 54/55 rounds. Do you mean 10 out of 10 rounds, 9 out of 10 rounds or 5 out of 10 rounds? I would think 50% would be considered consistent...there are a few very good players (Legends) that can score those numbers, but I would have to say not consistently..... every other round with those numbers.

    Ive been following not only this thread, but others with the same connotations about players using cheat programs in their game play. I find it rather strange that the producers of this game have been quite silent, except when a name is produced and made public. Neither condoning nor rebuking the so called "cheat programs". Furthermore since the lowering of the age limit from 18yrs to 13yrs it has been rather obvious how quickly some players have advanced with incredibly low scoring rounds in the pay to play tournaments in such a short amount of time since becoming a member. Multi-accouters are for a different time and topic.

    But then again after reading/rereading (getting past the legal bumble jumble) and searching the T&C's it has apparently become "vague" as to what "cheat programs" are not permitted with the use of this game, for non-commercial use.

    I would like to ask the producers of this game or any member(s) who are respected, honorable players, exactly which programs by name are considered cheat programs and are not permitted with this game? Please don't insult my intelligent with a reply "we are not aware of such programs". You can google and find a full page of WGT Cheat aides, are ALL these considered, non-approved and if you are using one your a cheater?

    Signed.......one who doesn't use supplements to enhance their pecker!...OO-D 

     

  • MBaggese
    15,367 Posts
    Thu, May 26 2011 2:20 AM

    jakestanfill7:

    Realistic, absolutely not, but still better than anything else out there.  Maybe one day when we incorporate stance and lie you'll start to see slightly more realistic scores.  Hope this provides some insight.

     

    Lol, and what do YOU know about this game?

    Just kidding, note the sarcasm.

  • PRIESTESS
    10,721 Posts
    Thu, May 26 2011 2:23 AM

    LOL.Blue,:) they would have to play well to beat a tough old campaigner like yer- self,You cant substitute all that experience on and around the greens,

RSS