Miantiao:
Looks like you're right regards how putting percentages are calculated.
Kind of makes my 45% of total made putts @ between 0-5 ft look ordinary, but it reflects my inability at times to control the yips on slick and curly 4.5ft downhill putts. Get lazy sometimes to check with chip view at that distance and pay the penalty :-D
Lol, your putting looks fine to me.
I still don't think I'm being clear so I'll have a go with your stats but remember this will be rough, I could see all the multi's rounds so it was a lot easier to do quickly.
You have played 3,504 RR, taken 53,210 putts @ 1.4 putts per hole.
That's 37, 981 holes or 4,220 x Nine holes. Something like 697 x 18 and 2,807 nine hole rounds.
Of the 53,210 putts you have holed:
0-5ft = 23, 949
5-10ft = 8,689
10-25ft = 4,629
25-50ft = 303
50ft+ = 11
Total = 37,581 (70.63%)
Missed = 15,629 There is no indication in the stats of what distance these putts were from.
So you've holed 70.63% of your putts from anywhere, it will certainly be higher that that for 0-5ft. Again as you've holed 23,949 from there and missed 15,629 in total means that even if every missed putt was from between 5 and 10 feet you'd still have holed 60.51% and clearly they weren't.
The 45.01% putts from 0-5ft probably reflects good approaches, it certainly doesn't show poor putting.
A shorter way of showing your putting percentage would be to simply use the 1.40pph, which gives you an overall success rate of 71.4%. I just wanted to put numbers by each distance and show again the %'s given there are of the total putts not just the successful ones.
The differences that show (70.63% against 71.40% success rate and 37,981 holes against 37,581 successful putts) are hopefully down to me doing this roughly in general and your holed approaches (which I've ignored) in particular. The fact your number of putts changed from 53,199 to 53,210 during me writing it didn't help either :-)