bossbird: For those of us who do take clashes seriously , we just ask for consistency which we are not currently getting.
I understand wanting consistency. What I don't understand is why people take the clash seriously or why they're surprised and upset when there are glitches. This is WGT. Just let it play out.
bossbird: To those mocking us who do take it seriously , it seems you do too , otherwise why bother commenting at all.
That's a faulty conclusion. The motivation for posting could simply be that they take the overall game seriously just not the clashes. In other words, one can take the larger aspect of an item seriously without taking individual aspects of the same item seriously.,
bossbird: If you have nothing worth adding , perhaps it would be better not adding anything at all !
One could make the same observation regarding the clash. I really struggle to see the value it adds to the overall game. Therefore, why have it?
Obviously, it has value to some. That's my point.
Simply because you don't see value to a post does not mean the post lacks value or worth. While you might not see the worth of the post, the one who wrote it certainly does. Why should your judgement of the post's worth trump their estimation of its worth?