Forums

Chat with MisterWGT - Nov 20th - Summary

• SHRUDE 5,835 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 4:03 PM

  YankeeJim:

  10-1 that changes in the very next episode.  :-)

  :)  your confidence is admirable.

• navigater 1,319 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 4:14 PM

  I would have .But figured it would have been over my head,from some of the post's Ive read From you guys.,But I am reg. now ,So I will be there next round

• Woodoworkery 3,498 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 4:22 PM

  I might have miss understood, but I thought he said all you had to do is type in WGT log in and you would be able to see games that other players played.

  Well I tried it and see nothing. Am I doing something wrong?

• SHRUDE 5,835 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 4:55 PM

  Woodoworkery:

  Well I tried it and see nothing. Am I doing something wrong?

  Early days yet Woody :)

  I don't think anyone has actually tried it as yet.

  I know LeGeNdCrUsHeR is having a shot at it 'as we speak'

  http://www.wgt.com/forums/p/140291/935040.aspx#935040

• LeGeNdCrUsHeR 2,067 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 6:51 PM

  SHRUDE:

  Woodoworkery:

  Well I tried it and see nothing. Am I doing something wrong?

  Early days yet Woody :)

  I don't think anyone has actually tried it as yet.

  I know LeGeNdCrUsHeR is having a shot at it 'as we speak'

  http://www.wgt.com/forums/p/140291/935040.aspx#935040

  Yes, I have mine up and running.  However, it takes a bit of knowledge about frame rates, yada yada...  I am still trying to iron out the "twitches"...lol

• mantis0014 8,946 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 7:32 PM

  overtheedge:

  When Chad checked how many community members were watching he was TOTALLY deflated. I truly think he thought he would see MANY more members on-line, watching and involved. 44 / FORTY FOUR!!!  Im sorry but 44 "community members" watching is an extremely weak following considering the so called "millions" in the community. 

  Lets hope there's another Twitch,,lol. Seriously.

  How many people would write and/or reply to a post in the Forum.  So that figure of 44, doesn't surprise me.

• WGTpizza 1,656 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 8:42 PM

  mantis0014:

  How many people would write and/or reply to a post in the Forum.  So that figure of 44, doesn't surprise me.

  I saw a high of 68 players at one point. Tell your friends, let's make the next one have a bigger audience :)

   

  Stay classy,

  -WGTpizza

• SHRUDE 5,835 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 9:08 PM

  WGTpizza:

  let's make the next one have

  ... a better response to all our pending questions/ suggestions/ ideas.

  If the quality of the information is good, the participation will be too.

• 9,041 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 9:18 PM

  WGTpizza:

  I saw a high of 68 players at one point. Tell your friends, let's make the next one have a bigger audience :)

  I posted in my cc about the chat, along the lines of "well, what did you think of it ?".

  To my amazement not one of the T/Ms and Legends even knew about it !!

  Further to that only ONE other Legend had even heard of misterWGT !!

  These ppl have been playing this game for years not months like I, Beggers belief that you could spend so much time doing something and not get involved in trying to shape it or see where it's going...

  Mind you I shouldn't be so surprised, 9/10th's of the regulars on here who are so quick to post about the most inane minutiae or rail on about FREE stuff, couldn't be bothered either..

  What's the old saying ?  "There's nowt so q.ueer as folks" ...Andy (damn filter)

• SHRUDE 5,835 Posts

  Fri, Nov 23 2012 9:47 PM

  alcaucin:

  I posted in my cc about the chat, along the lines of "well, what did you think of it ?".

  To my amazement not one of the T/Ms and Legends even knew about it !!

  Further to that only ONE other Legend had even heard of misterWGT !!

  Unfortunately there  is a large majority who simply aren't forum dwellers.
  They rely on their help and information from specific others who tend to offer their knowledge.

  I am sure once this 2 way street is tuned WGT may promote it better. Right now , they had better not.