Hate to break it to ya cupcake, but yes, legends ARE at a disadvantage. Most holes are a 2-3 club difference from legend to master, some holes are 5-6 club differences...and in most cases, masters/TM are using the same clubs as legends, so yes, it's a disadvantage. Just because Charlemagne is a very good player who has overcome the difference in the game doesn't mean that the advantage isn't present. I've only been a legend for a short time, I was a very good tour master IMO and was doing well in the ready-go's and I dreaded moving up to legend because I could see the leaderboards, under no circumstances should a very good TM be able to consistently beat legends. I wasn't nearly as good as the players I was beating, was just flat out wrong to be honest. Now that I've made legend, I find I can occasionally compete, but no where near the way I was competing as a TM. That's fine by me, I haven't been playing this game nearly as long as some have, and those players should be rewarded for the time they've put in, not punished because they're better.
I honestly don't understand how any sane person can say with a straight face that legend's aren't at a disadvantage. Player A has 115yds to the green with a wedge in his hand while Player B has 160yds to the green with 7 iron in his hands...who are you betting on?....thought so