Forums

V E M !

• MCH2 36 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 10:53 AM

  A agree with Dougie.  That club is rate at 225 and the ball went 220.  My opinion,  it didn't have enough BS to carry that distance with a tailwind that tends to lower the trajectory causing less carry but more roll out.  If VEM was involved, it was 1 yard's worth.

• spdemon 1,588 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 11:06 AM

  MCH2:

  A agree with Dougie.  That club is rate at 225 and the ball went 220.  My opinion,  it didn't have enough BS to carry that distance with a tailwind that tends to lower the trajectory causing less carry but more roll out.  If VEM was involved, it was 1 yard's worth.

  that 3 iron will go almost 230 on the fly without spin and the wind is with (not much but ) plus the hole plays downhill that shot on the ding was dancing 

• Jimbog1964 8,378 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 11:11 AM

  DodgyPutter:

  As to the rest I'd just be re-hashing if I responded. 

  Thanks for the last part.  Small mercy but take it where we can.

  And the rest of it we left VEM to one side, and got a discussion on parts you lifted to make a point, and then snide crap on parts I lifted.  None of it anything to do with anything the thread is here for.

  Are you for real...

  Why not just stick to the pertinent points, rather than marking people on how they choose to quote, which you are not good at anyway.  

• Jimbog1964 8,378 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 11:16 AM

  MCH2:

  A agree with Dougie.  That club is rate at 225 and the ball went 220.  My opinion,  it didn't have enough BS to carry that distance with a tailwind that tends to lower the trajectory causing less carry but more roll out.  If VEM was involved, it was 1 yard's worth.

  spdemon:

  that 3 iron will go almost 230 on the fly without spin and the wind is with (not much but ) plus the hole plays downhill that shot on the ding was dancing 

  Sp bango IMO, and all day every day for that shot.

• DodgyPutter 4,690 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 2:33 PM

  You just can't let go, all I did was answer a question you asked me and and explain why I cut your words (again as you mentioned it) for which I get a rant about off subject.

  Jimbog1964:

  And the rest of it we left VEM to one side, and got a discussion on parts you lifted to make a point, and then snide crap on parts I lifted.  None of it anything to do with anything the thread is here for.

  Three things in my first post:

  1. About whether a poster experienced VEM; possible alternatives, the fact I wasn't sure I'd ever seen it and that I thought AgentBrown most likely had it about right.  

  2. I discussed about someone stat's being called terrible, and they were similar to mine.  I didn't bring this up, they were already being discussed on this thread including by you.

  3. I also made a joke about your habit of misquoting. I think you putting your own words in other peoples mouths is wrong and I'll point it out if and when I choose to. The example given in my next post was in repsonse to  "So what meaning got twisted that time???"  Only one answer for three ???'s and I'm going off topic, lol.

  I wont turn someones (that isn't you) obviously upset: 

  "They can crank the VEM, not crank the VEM, it's all the same to me in the end as they won't be seeing any more of my cash."

  Into. 

   Thudman69:

  They can crank the VEM

  Jimbog1964:

  Are you for real...

  Lol

  Jimbog1964:

  Why not just stick to the pertinent points, rather than marking people on how they choose to quote, which you are not good at anyway.  

  See 1, 2 and 3; and sorry I'll try to improve, thanks teach'.  I know i'll never get it through to you but I think that to misrepresent someone and pretend it's a "quote" is wrong.

   

• Jimbog1964 8,378 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 3:01 PM

  DodgyPutter:

  I also made a joke about your habit of misquoting.

  You made another snide comment about a post I made to another person that had nothing to do with you until then, is all you did. The definition of a joke is that it is meant to be funny, and you knew very well what you were up to - YET  AGAIN

  So we have yet another post of nonsense from you, nothing to do with the thread.

  DodgyPutter:

  and pretend it's a "quote" is wrong.

  OK proof read that bit if you like.  I see only a copy paste with my eyes.

  I would not mind if you got anything right, but do you seem unable to read a line line without seeing differences.  Do you proof read photo copies and find differences too??? Unbelievable even by your low standards.

  EDIT: Probably over your head, but quotes in a forum are lifted quickly and you are in a minority of one thinking I change stuff in that / target whatever in an unreasonable manner.  

  I don't think we need any more pages on your interpretations of why you think I never answered properly.  My points are made as clear as possible intended in a light hearted often but also constructive manner. Maybe just think about that minority of one, and stick to issues in the thread for a change.  

  Respectfully, whatever your reason, please stop the snide comments.  It got very boring some time ago.

   

   

   

• DodgyPutter 4,690 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 3:15 PM

  You are unbelievable, so here we go again. 

   

• burchell123 362 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 5:25 PM

  VEM is a bad excuse for having bottom end pragrammers,why do you think wgt introduced 7-9 14-16 wind and so on,all it's for is to cover up there own  F ups

  ROCKY

   

• renniw52 5,385 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 6:04 PM

  I just blame every bad outcome from a shot on myself. Anything said otherwise will always bring smart a$$ comments from someone who knows it all, does it all and always shoots ridiculous low scores. Not worth my breath or time anymore to blame anything on strange happenings. It is all my fault, always has been and always will be. Just makes life easier and keeps me from getting upset at someone.

• AgentBrown123 907 Posts

  Sat, Sep 13 2014 8:40 PM

  All I'm saying is that the game can be figured out. It's not all random and VEM VEM VEM. 

  I think the wind is what most people miss judge. It's hard to assess at times. Burchell said it was probably bad programming since they changed it to approximately a certain wind. But whether or not it is -- it's a benefit for wgt at this point with all this slow meter and auto dinging crap.

  I personally think wgt made the wind hard to judge on purpose to make it difficult for cheaters. Hopefully these cheaters don't figure out the wind.